So, as time goes on, species can only lose genetic information, but never gain it. So, over time, we will all slowly devolve, as genetic information is lost, but never (re)gained. Thus, you are postulating a sort of 'evolution-in-reverse', starting with a mystical creation, and ultimately ending with us slowly turning into bacteria, and then nothing at all. Now that's a new one! I like it! I know, I know, the evidence supports nothing of the kind, but still, there's a science fiction novel in there somewhere.
jamstigator Reviewed by jamstigator on . Macroevolution examples Supporters of Creationism believe that there are no example(s) of Macroevolution - put simply most supporters of creationism don't believe that living things have become more complex over time. This is a broad generalisation but it will fit most peoples understanding of the concepts. From Wikipedia: Some Creationists have also adopted the term "macroevolution" to describe the form of evolution that they reject. They may accept that evolutionary change is possible within species Rating: 5