I know its a moot point, because you will respond with some sort of "logic" as to why its ok, but can you seriously find an arguement that you didnt have your proof from answers in genesis?

That and trueorigin.

I am not discrediting your sources here, no matter what my opinion on them. But it seems like you can only tackle an arguement if there is something on one of those two websites to support you.

Its great you found a reference that helps you out, its another to depend solely on said reference for your point.

The real question is, can you find the same answers you are getting from these websites, elsewhere? Widely elsewhere, or narrowly elsewhere?

At this point in time, honestly, at least to me, you would have more credability by just leaving the links to those websites out. It really is starting to look like nothing more then a crutch for you, and your inability to grasp or tackle any subjects that are brought up unless you can find a link to something in AiG is telling.
imitator Reviewed by imitator on . A path to faith with science Some people don't think that faith and science are compatible. This is to demonstrate that is not the case and that science plays a part in helping to confirm God's existence and reveal his divine nature. This is to demonstrate one path to God. There is contained within both evidence for God's existence and attributes from the nature of the physical universe, and also evidence from direct communication from God and mankind. Finding out whether God exists or not is not just for philosophers Rating: 5