Quote Originally Posted by natureisawesome
I already went over a "pantheon-esque" setting in my original post. If you have any objections, feel free to post them with references.
We did, and then you said No, it's not the case. You have no reason to believe it.

We have shown evidence which you choose to reject, but when we disagree with your evidence, it's because we refuse to see the truth.

If you blast us with a lot of information, it's the truth. If we blast you with a lot of information, it's unfair and elephant hurling.

When you make assumptions, yours are correct. When we make assumptions, we need to back them up.

When we question your sources, you say it's because the creation scientists are being discriminated against in biased evaluations. When you question our sources, it's because our sources are corrupt, and we believe in them like bland religion.

Have fun with the thread.