You havn't corrected me at all, except this once because you appeared to be defending buddhism . And don't cuss in my thread please.
Oh, never EXCEPT this time eh? Is that way we are phrasing it this time.

And there is a stark difference between pointing out wrongly made statements in regards to something, and defending it. I am defending the truth behind something, not anything that it states. So I am not, actually, defending Buddhism.

Yes you have.
Come on now, get with the program man. You know if you make a statement like this you are going to get asked to prove it.

Prove it. Show me an example.

I understand now that you are not a Buddhist. You were defending buddhism. If someone came in another thread about buddism ,and argued that Christianity made more sense, people would rightly assume he is a Christian. You have stated things as facts numerous times, and I will not back down.
I am not defending Buddhism. If someone made a FACTUAL comment towards buddhism in a negative or positive light, I would not care at all. But when you sprout half truths and flat out lies about something, I will correct you, so that others who may not know dont assume that what you said was true, and end up misinformed.

And again, provide me some proof of something I have stated as an absolute fact?

You cannot make an assertion without evidence. You have made many assertions in this thread. You cannot debate ANYTHING without evidence to back your assertions. Whenever you state a possibility, you assert that as a fact. Otherwise, you cannot state whether is may be possible or not, and you have no way to make any assertion. I base my assertions upon evidence, the evidence I wish you would look to, for if you did it would show evidence of God. Your assertions are groundless.
How can something not be a possibility if you cant prove that its not possible? Isnt that the entire concept behind a possibility, is that its possible? And to make it not a possibility, you have to be able to prove its not possible. Show me the proof. Undeniable, unquestionable proof.

And I have looked at your evidence. I have read almost every link you have provided, and every word you have written. Just because I cant make what you think is a "logical" jump to the conclusion that god exists, doesnt mean that im illogical or wrong or ignorant or anything else. It means that I wasnt able to use "faith" to make the leap. You havent shown any concrete evidence. Evidence that you would be able to take to a scientific gathering and say, hey, this definitively and permanently shows the existance of God. If you had such evidence, you most certainly would not have to explain it to us, as we would already have heard about it.

If you don't like talking to me, or if you don't like what I'm saying, leave. Honestly, I'm tired of bickering with you. I'm tired of side objections being brought up that arn't neccesary for the purpose of this thread. I'm tired of arguing over the same thing also.
I have no problem talking with you when you arent slandering me and lying about what I have said. That has no place in a decent conversation. And if you honestly feel that you cant refrain from doing so, please, tell me so, so that I can bow out now and save us both a big waste of time.

That's so rediculous that doesn't even deserve a response.
Come on now. I have scriptures quoted for you, and a pretty solid bit of logic behind it. And apparently others who want to see your response to this.

You cant just choose to ignore the questions that are too hard for you to handle with a simple link to AiG.