Quote Originally Posted by natureisawesome
No way. Isn't that why I said at the end, that It was open for debate? I've actually gotten more side arguments than anything else.

Here's how it works. You read the article. If it looks right, then you can go ahead with it. If it looks wrong, then lets talk about your objections. But this portion of the thread isn't about showing my proof. I already showed my proof in the original post. There's no way for me to prove it to everyone. You have to prove it to yourself. The best I can do, is point out the logic and evidence the best I can, and then it's for everyone to accept or deny.

If you don't agree with my proof after everything, then that's your choice. It happens all the time. People disagree and someone will say "you still havn't shown me proof" whether the person showed them valid proof or not. This can go on forever!

So if you don't agree with my evidence, that's your choice. Say, I don't agree with your logic/evidence. But if you say I don't have eny evidence, you're ignorant and the numerous page post is right there at the beginning of the thread to show this plain and clear.

So if you are really conscerned about finding the truth of the matter then this is a good place for you to discuss it. If not, then perhaps you shouldn't be here.
Many people have raised arguments that, at the time, for whatever reason, you feel that you shouldn't have to respond, because it's "unreasonable" or "unrealistic", or that they've been smoking too much weed.