A path to faith with science

[Hardcore Newbie]

II understand now that you are not a Buddhist. You were defending buddhism. If someone came in another thread about buddism ,and argued that Christianity made more sense, people would rightly assume he is a Christian.

I thought it was pretty clear he was defending Buddhism in the sense that you can't disprove it, not that he believed it. I defend Xianity or theism from time to time when somebody makes a remark that doesn't make sense, that doesn't mean I'm a theist in any way. There's a difference between assumption and "rightly assuming". Rightly assuming is when you find out you're right, after the fact.

That's so rediculous that doesn't even deserve a response.

I thought it looked valid.