Imitator:

natureisawesome:
I go with the evidence. You do not. You dream up possibilities with no evidence, and disregard the evidence that does exist.

And I don't mean to be rude, but you are being hypocritical. You contend that I have taken hold of a God when I don't know what else might be out there, but what about your belief? Buddha taught that all things are impermanent, constantly arising, becoming, changing and fading. He didn't observe these things by empirical science. He "envisioned" them. These claims have never been validated in any way whatsoever. You believe that
buddha's teachings are valid, and you don't know what else might be out there either. Buddism teaches there is no God. Buddism has it's own set of "noble truths". What do you have to support these claims? Nothing. what evidence do I have to support my God? Everything.
Seriously. Im getting aggitated at this now. Do you lalala read at all? Ever? Or do you just look for slight bits to base your quotes off of before spouting the same stuff you said before and were corrected on at least 4 times now?
You havn't corrected me at all, except this once because you appeared to be defending buddhism . And don't cuss in my thread please.

I DID NOT, nor have I EVER, stated something was a fact.
Yes you have.

I dont follow Buddhism, I dont agree with a portion of what they believe, but I find it interesting. I dont neccessarily hold true the theory of never ending, never beginning, but at least I understand it fully, and can see the points for and against it. You on the other hand have displayed a complete lack of understanding of the points of Buddhism on at least two occasions in this thread, and then dismissed it as a false religion. There is your example of dismissing something you dont understand.
I havn't displayed any misunderstanding about Buddhism. You certainly were working to defend Buddhism.

And you have no PROOF of God's existance, because if you did, there would be no way for anyone to ever argue or bring up any counter point to your display. This entire thread is because you dont have proof, and you feel the need to make people share the same beliefs as you, so to validate your beliefs more. If you had taken any classes in sociology or psycology, it would be painfully obvious. Its a textbook case, one of the first things studied when you are looking into an ethics surrounding, because with ethics, innevitably comes the people stating that ethics are because of God.
I do have proof of God's existence. That's what this whole thread is about. It's not my fault people choose ignorance and fail to recognise the evidence.

You disregarded Carbon Dating awhile back, but iirc, what is the main way that creationists use to try to show that the Great Flood happened? Yeah...
Creation scientists do not depend solely on carbon dating. 6,000 years is certainly a lot shorter, and can be possibly used with the right adjustments (if they were known, but this would still be based upon asumptions), but they recognise their bias and the limits of science, wheras evolutionists have not. creationists do not rely on dating methods the way evolutionists do.

So, for the FIFTH time now, if I hold any beliefs, you have no clue about them, because I have not posted once about my personal beliefs in this thread. Not once. I have NOT stated anything as fact, I have NOT stated any personal beliefs, I have NOT claimed that any one thing was right and another was wrong. The ONLY person doing this is yourself, quit projecting yourself upon me.
I understand now that you are not a Buddhist. You were defending buddhism. If someone came in another thread about buddism ,and argued that Christianity made more sense, people would rightly assume he is a Christian. You have stated things as facts numerous times, and I will not back down.

If you cant stop with the slander and lying, then I have nothing more to say to you. This is getting old, and enough is enough. You can say what you will about me raising hypotheticals and trying to get you to flesh out things you have said in light of other possible evidence, but do not attribute anything I say as a belief or fact stated by me, unless I specifically state it as such. And trust me, just for you, I will make it blatantly clear when I do so.
You cannot make an assertion without evidence. You have made many assertions in this thread. You cannot debate ANYTHING without evidence to back your assertions. Whenever you state a possibility, you assert that as a fact. Otherwise, you cannot state whether is may be possible or not, and you have no way to make any assertion. I base my assertions upon evidence, the evidence I wish you would look to, for if you did it would show evidence of God. Your assertions are groundless.

If you don't like talking to me, or if you don't like what I'm saying, leave. Honestly, I'm tired of bickering with you. I'm tired of side objections being brought up that arn't neccesary for the purpose of this thread. I'm tired of arguing over the same thing also.

Let the potsherds strive with the potsherds.

And finally.

Your very own holy laws, The Ten Commandments, does not state false gods. It states:
That's so rediculous that doesn't even deserve a response.