Imitator, as far as the reality verifiable/unverifiable thing, I'm done with that. I don't think you got my point . "Anything is possible", statement of fact. prove it.

From here on, will you please just deal with the evidence we have around us.

As far as your question goes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by imitator
What about the fish? And the animals who float on water?

A huge ******* flood wouldnt have affected them at all. And the point was to start all over...

I mean, god didnt say, "Two of every kind on the ark, except the swimming ones, and the floating ones."

Granted I find parts of the entire ordeal a bit of a stretch, since good and bad are human creations, and animals have no concept of good and bad. I mean, are there bad giraffe's? And if so, how are they bad/evil?
The animals weren't killed off because they were evil. The animals were killed off because God judged man, and animals were in the way. It was a cleansing of the whole earth. The flood itself was done both to judge the world and also as a sign to future generations. The flood was an allegory of the gospel. And it was man's fault the animals got hurt, just like it's mans fault that animals live in a world of death and torment. Many of the animals in the sea did die out. The fossil record shows that plainly.

Yes, it was slightly tongue in cheek, but I am interested how you... or should I say your website, explains things such as this?

Why did all the fish get a free ride without any worries, but the land creatures had to do a lottery to see which two out of the entire population of that species would survive?
I would hardly say the fish had a free ride. There was massive earthquakes, underground water resevoirs breaking open, lava eruptions, water enviroment going crazy, swirling streams of thousands of tons of sediment and rock etc.

I explained myself and used websites and there's nothing wrong with that.