imitator:

There are places who are unbiased. There are unbiased reports done through many places. I find alot of interesting things from University based studies. Even if something isnt entirely unbiased, you can find things that arent as biased as others. A website that is entirely pro-creationism/evolutionism is the most biased thing you can find when you are searching for information on those two subjects. You cant get more biased then that.

I will tell you right now, that I expected that exact arguement from you. Its the typical one. Please, show me examples of where well thought out, formulated essays and theories founded upon the theory of creationism werent given the same exposure as similarly well formulated essays and theories on evolution.

I have yet to see a scientific journal of any kind not publish a well written, and varifiable essay/thesis, no matter what the subject. The key is, is the science there, and is it provable? If it isnt, no matter what the subject is, it wont get in. And you are rooting for a theory that is largely unprovable(God existing, creating the earth). There are some very very big blaring holes in the theory, which doesnt mean its not correct, but certainly means it is not provable by any means currently.

But just to clarify, you are stating that there is a concerted effort by a large group of people, to try to hinder or prevent the publication and exposure of the theory of creationism? That people are purposely, for no other reason then the subject of the thesis/esasy, rejecting the work of creationist scientists, who are putting out work that is just as good, if not better then the work they publish instead?

Its not unconceivable, but highly unlikely, considering there are plenty of articles in US based scientific publications that were pro-pot, and thats not the general concensus in regards to this country, and the government. Ive seen plenty of unpopular, or highly criticized articles published, because they were so well written, and were high quality thesis'. So this would, literally, be a first for me to see that there is a concerted effort by some large body of people, to purposely hinder and prevent the publication of creationistic theories and thesis papers.
I don't agree that there are totally unbiased journals or media.

There are testimonies of creation scientists who have been unrightfully (and probably unlawfully ) discriminated against that you can find by searching on the internet.

Everyone is biased and when you understand that, you realize it's a matter of finding the right bias rather than no bias. Even when we anylize information, we used a biased mind to do that. People have to decide for themselves ultimatley for themselves whether what someone shares is right or wrong. I believe that comparing both sides and weighing the evidence is an important part ofd this process.