Imitator:

Report me then. At this point, with your insulting tone, and your insulting of anyone elses viewpoint, I think you wouldnt like the results on your end either. The ONLY reason I havent reported you myself is because you were continuing the conversation, which interested me.
That's rediculous. This is my thread. Even if it wasn't I have obeyed all of the rules of the forum. You on the otherhand, have sworn, (and refused to stop swering) you have repeatedly posted over and over andover with spam like posts and off topic arguements and objections, and would not stop when I asked. You have also posted off topic once again.

It is against God's laws to worship any idol, even if it is of himself. Yet in almost every church you go to, you will find Christ upon the cross in the center of the church. Every person who goes there and worships is worshiping a false idol, and that much is comfirmed by the Church, since it was not allowed for a long time by one of the Popes, for that exact reason.

So do you, natureisawesome, have a crucifix anywhere? Do you wear a crucifix? What do you think of those who blatantly and willing defy one of God's laws by owning one of these idols, or going to a church which proudly displays one?
No I don't actually. It's wrong to make assumptions like that. I have no denomination. I have no church I agree with. The cross is ultimately derived from what's called a solar halo which was ultimately derived from the Babylonian mystery religion. It has no relation to true Christianity.

He has displayed a fundamental lack of understanding of basic philosophy and Buddhism, and general logic in quite a few cases. The fact that he states that his perceptions have to be correct is probably the most hilarious statement I have ever heard, considering human perception is probably THE most flawed way to try to find facts, as we can be fooled in so many ways. Optical illusions anyone?
And it's interesting how you continue to use your invalid mind to try to come up with valid arguements against me. Pointing out optical allusions does not help your case at all because for us to recognise optical allusions we have to use our eyes in the first place.
He attacked the Four Noble Truths, without obviously having ever read them, because what he stated was completely incorrect if you take even a short period of time to read them and the scripture they come from.
How do you know I've never read them or read about them? Quite an assumption.

He claims that science is wrong on any aspect that might disprove or cause him a problem in regards to his subject, but then uses science to try to prove what he is talking about. His science is always right, our science is always wrong.
Science is a tool. It can be used in a good way, or it can be turned in the wrong direction, all depending on the person that uses it.

But I am done with this thread. Congratulations nature, you ran out someone who was probably one of the more enthusiastic of this thread, and one who never once ridiculed your beliefs and really only said anything negative of you once you started doing the same to me. You turned a conversation into a *** contest, you turned a conversation into a means for you to insult everyone who didnt agree with your viewpoint, and you turned a conversation into nothing more then another typical thread by ignorant small minded religious people. Also, please note, I am not saying all religious people are ignorant or small minded, just some.
How ironic. I think if anyone has turned this into a pissing match it's you. You're not enthusiastic about the Truth. I don't believe you came in here with the right attitude.


The fact that you wouldnt even begin to entertain any other possibilities, while the entire time chiding us for not entertaining your possibility, is hilarious, and hypocritical at best.
That's not true at all. I get the feeling you derive this strange sick pleasure from turning christians away from their faith.

Also, you still have never disproven the Dreamer theory, therefore, its still a possibility. And Id recommend really learning what a fact, theory, possibility, and how to identify a statement of any of those apart from the other. You seem to be lacking that right now, and I think it will help you convey your point a bit better next time.
I did answer the dreamer theory. And you answered "NO". You wouldn't accept it. Like I said, ultimately everyone has to prove it to themself. You chose not to. I'm quite capable, much more than you in knowledge of those things, and the fact that you denied you were stating a possibility as a fact multiple times, and then finally changed your objection dramatically (and in effect recognizing your previous error without addmiting it) show that your are the one in need of lessons in reason and logic.


Have fun with the rest of your thread, I am unsubscribing to it. Report me if you wish.
I will report you, and as a final note I recognise and hope it's obvious to others that you are unreasonable and argumentative, and in my honest opinion in a state of mental anguish. I hope the best for you. Please don't come back.