I too think he is guilty and is a disgrace to the APBT. It is people like him that give this breed and their heritage a bad rep.

Many people have a warped view of dog fighting due to people without knowlage and respect for for the dogs.

Originaly, dog fighting was a gentlman's sport in england. Later it moved to the US. Also, in the past dog fighting had rules and regulations much like boxing: there were weight classes, if the dog refused to fight it lost, and if a dog held a winning hold for too long the dogs were seperated, then the losing dog would have to want to fight more (scratch) or was concidered a loser.

Dogs rarely fought to the death, and the handler always had the right to forfit the match and get their dog.

In closing, people bred these dogs to fight; it is hardwired into their genetics. It is our responsability to care for these anamals, and not let them be ruined by "geheto minded" people like vick with no morals or standards.
dylan Reviewed by dylan on . What's your take on the Michael Vick situation? whats your take on the michael vick situation and what punishment do u think he deserves...and do u think he is guilty...no johnny c so he dont have the if the collar dont fit u must aquit help..haha Rating: 5