Why not? In the end, it may be right...

Well, the thing is... I'm really sure that the universe was designed by trillions upon trillions of invisible omniscient pixies. It's impossible to disprove the pixies, and the pixie theory fits perfectly into the missing piece of the creation puzzle.


My point being; the pixie hypothesis and the God hypothesis are both the same thing; a hypothesis. There is no actual evidence pointing to God, but rather God is assumed to be the only option because he fits so well where we can't explain the unexplained. As I showed with my pixies though, all you need is an active imagination to think of something that perfectly explains anything unexplainable. There's no extra empiracle evidence to give God more validity than my pixies.


When you really analyze the notion of God, it's like somebody decided to design the perfect logical explanation. "Ok, here's what we do; we think of a guy that can do everything, knows everything, is infinite in every respect, and he created the universe." When you design the infinite being, he will of course fit into every explanation.