Quote Originally Posted by Delta9 UK
That's no different to reading popular mechanics and drawing the same conclusion.

You might regret calling people "dummy" - you are intelligent enough to know this whole think reeks.
The Loose Change people, and most other 9/11 Truthers, claim that Popular Mechanic's conclusions and studies are based on lies because of a political agenda - which is an opinion that I do not happen to agree with, but is hard to disprove. It is possible that they (PM) are lying, though.

The architect that I met on that morning predicted the collapse of the towers before it happened. To me, this was more convincing than reading an analysis in a magazine after the fact - no matter how uncorrupt and qualified the researchers are.