i had to read this post a couple of times, but i think you're reading a bit too much into his statements. at no point did he equate gays with animals. what he did do was to equate one sinful sexual act with another sinful sexual act. in his eyes i'm sure he thought he was being very liberal by not damning the entire concept of homosexuality. the views he expressed are surprisingly widespread and, considering the kind of fear that usually engenders such beliefs, his post was nearly rational. don't be so quick to be offended by the ignorance of others. if we all had the same opinions this place would become deathly dull.