Attraction... from an evolutionary biology/physiological perspective...

Not only is symmetrical universally attractive, but the closer your face and body adheres to the Golden Ratio of nature (1.618), the more attractive it will be deemed (notwithstanding getting lupus).

Women have enlarged breasts to remind men of the buttocks. We are the only primates who don't mate exclusively viz a viz doggy style and men need visual sexual markers while looking at a woman's front.

Upon viewing an attractive member of the opposite gender, phenylethylamine (PEA) is released andâ??viola!â??lust at first sight, the butterflies in thy stomach. If I'm not mistaken, which I might, this is strongest when two people lock eyes, thus the real reason the eyes are the gateway to the soul. Oxytocinâ??not to be confused with Oxycontinâ??is released when two people touch each other and creates emotional bonds, is what's ultimately responsible for love; thus, I suppose, the evolutionary significance of keeping fair skin.

That's all I can think off the top of my head, for now.
Oh My High Reviewed by Oh My High on . The face is terribly underrated Insofar as what makes a person attractive, the structure of the face is the key, fundamental, and by far most important factor. And yet people are considered beautiful when they just have a hot body, know how to apply 7 pounds of makeup (if female, and sometimes male), but they have a shitty bone structure. I thought of this because I saw a picture of Paris Hilton, who has quite a poor facial bone structure, and I can tell would look like absolute SHIT without her layers (I think she Rating: 5