Quote Originally Posted by dreadhed
You know Clinton was one of the most warring President, indescretely of course, in about 45 years (I could be a little off). So just go on believing what the proven left wing obviously biased media tells you instead of researching all points of information yourself. Alot of people are really good at that and then forming opinions without questioning. Does every one just forget all the wars Clinton engaged in "for" America, but thats ok because he got some head in the Oval Office and , that's where the focus needed to go, right???! If you think Sadam was not so bad then all I can say is too bad you did not live there so you could watch your mom and sister get raped while they shoved a hot poker up your ass. Sounds like a good time doesn't it? Don't get me wrong I am not a huge Bush fan, but I am tired of hearing all of these misinformed whiners crying about it. Move to a country like that and see what you think. Why do you think Iraqis would try to escape to America? When you have a month/s notice that you're going to be invaded it's not too hard to get rid of every thing. Did you know they DID find some wmds. Syrian gas bombs. Or do you not count that because it does not fit your agenda. They did not find stock piles is more accurate. It would not be too hard to give them to someone else, such as a close neighbor. All I can say is I'm glad he is out of power. Now they need to find Osama and kill his fucking ass on public TV for all of the world to see. Just one more question where was all of this crying when Clinton bomd Iraq?
Moronic thinking leads to moronic decisions.
Another countries politics should be decided by the people of that country , the people of France and Britain and even the US have known civil war due to oppresive regimes, the people of Iraq could've been left to sort out their own shit.
But wait a minute wasn't a former US goverment instrumental in setting up Saddam in the first place
If it was about human rights how come the US isn't rattling it's sabres at China?? or Turkmenistan?? or even Rwanda?
Are you forgetting the fact that the US and Britain have both admitted that the intelligence about WMD was "flawed"?
So the focus should be on Clinton??
Why should Clinton be the only one to get it? Look back at post 1945 and you will find lots of incidences of the goverment of the USA using force to enable the US ideaology to be furthered.
Pinochet,Saddam,Osama and his Taliban were all aided and supported by the US , way back in 63 Saddam was in contact with the CIA , it was the betrayal of the people who wanted to topple Saddam after the Gulf War that has left an awful lot of Iraqis believing the US are liars.
The cronyism and the blatant abuse of power are shown in the awarding of contracts for the re-building of Iraq.
Now what were you saying??

PS Never assume anything , I do a lot of research to back up any claims I make so you can forget that tack right away.