Quote Originally Posted by KevinFinnerty
To all the people talking about how horrible dogfighting is, answer me this: what is the huge moral difference between dogfighting and hunting? Don't get me wrong, I think both are disgusting, but I don't see why one should be legal while the other is illegal.
Because dog fighting is training dogs to fight until one of them kills the other. It is nothing but sick "entertainment" for sick people. Do they eat the dogs after they fight them? No, but people do eat animals after hunting them. Not all, some do it for sport and I'm against that. Animals should only be killed if they are sick and suffering, meant for food, or have rabies.

How can you compare hunting to pitting 2 dogs against one another and making them fight to the death? IMO there is no comparison there.