Quote Originally Posted by mfqr
Well, I would assume that it would depend on what you change. From what I know of this story, ET's and his future self came and abducted him to test out the time machine, and to do a mass landing to change the course of history. And I'm guessing that what they want to change would be a nuclear world war in the near future. They want to change our whole world, and make it completely free and peaceful, supposedly. What I want to know, timedrifter, is: How do you know that all of this stuff happened on THIS worldline/timeline? What about divergence? Wouldn't just traveling to the future or past put you at least slightly in another worldline? For instance, John Titor's time machine had a divergence confidence of 2.0 - 2.5%. So when you traveled time, and saw these mass landings, isn't it plausible to think that there will at least be some slight differences in this worldline?

Oh, and can you possibly give me the URL to your interview(s)?
you bring up many good points, thank you, here goes:

in my interviews I theorized that there are many worldline timelines but all attached to the same one worldline timeline.

the divergence thing is correct but only the time traveler can experience it, no one else will notice, that is why my first statement makes sense.

yes it is plausible, the mass landing did not happen on MY first visits, there was a horrible war that there is not enough words to describe. the hideousness can haunt your dreams forever and do haunt me, but then again the mass landing haunts me and that is what I choose to look forward to.

the mass landing itself loops many times, many rewinds take place until perfection.

I will be back to post more soon, peace