Quote Originally Posted by pisshead
yes, because it's a good sign of a free country when your 'top tier' candidates all get invited to the lavish bilderberg group meetings...and they want to silence everyone else...

but that's okay...clinton will make as good a globalist puppet as bush...

Clinton, Edwards Heard Discussing Excluding Rivals [align=left] Newsroom America
Friday, July 13, 2007[/align]

Following a debate during Thursday's Democratic candidates forum at the NAACP convention, news agency microphones picked up comments by Sens. Hillary Clinton and John Edwards as they discussed limiting future debates to only "serious" candidates.
"We should try to have a more serious and smaller group," Edwards, a former U.S. senator from North Carolina, was heard saying as his comments were picked up by a Fox News microphone.
Agreeing, Clinton, D-N.Y., responded, "We've got to cut the number . . . They're not serious."

At that point, Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois and Rep. Dennis Kucinich of Ohio walked by, with Clinton thanking them for attending. The, turning back to Edwards, she said she believed their campaigns had already attempted to limit candidates in the debate and "we've gotta get back to that."
Kucinich did not respond well to the comments. "Imperial candidates are as repugnant to the American people and to our democracy as an imperial president," he said.
Go figure, More of the same from the frontrunners. There was a poll on Lou Dobbs that said 86% of his followers were considering changing from Democrat or Republican to independents. Since I'm already one, I won't have to. Wouldn't that be a wonderful thing, an independent constituency, maybe then we could get a Ron Paul or a Mike Gravel in the top spot. Highly unlikely as most voters are brain dead, at least the ones that voted in the last presidential election proved to be.