Shorter Signatures?

[birdgirl73]

We shouldn't.

I agree that the huge ones are obnoxious, and I find, for the most part, that they go with the personalities who seem to have the greatest need to appear to be making an impressive statement. They have to do this instead of making impressive statements in their actual posts, I guess. Or instead just saying nothing (which is sometimes the most impressive thing of all).

As problems on the site go, sig size is fairly far down on my list of concerns. That's what the scroll button is for.

birdgirl73 Reviewed by birdgirl73 on 07-13-2007. Shorter Signatures? I was wondering about having a limit on the amount of lines in a signature... I like seeing most people's sigs as it serves as another way to remember someone, but some people have very very long signatures, nearly a page on a 1024x768 res screen. 7 lines seems appropriate, but i may be biased :p Rating: 5

[the image reaper]

We shouldn't.

I agree that the huge ones are obnoxious, and I find, for the most part, that they go with the personalities who seem to have the greatest need to appear to be making an impressive statement. They have to do this instead of making impressive statements in their actual posts, I guess. Or instead just saying nothing (which is sometimes the most impressive thing of all).

As problems on the site go, sig size is fairly far down on my list of concerns. That's what the scroll button is for.

as always, the voice of intelligence and good manners ... we are lucky to have you, Birdgirl :thumbsup: ... (if you can read this, THANK a teacher )

[budsmoker only]

i dunno what sigs your talkin bout...
none of them seem to huge, or maybe i just scroll down quick enough to pass it.....