I love arguing.

[Oh My High]

I'm a master debater but I make such comprehensive arguments that hardly anyone ever tries to refute my arguments, so strong and impenetrable, so I hardly ever get to "debate" anyone.

[cannabis campbell]

Yeah but an arguement and a debate are two different things, i dont mind having a good old debate but once i get into an arguement i sometimes lose control of my temper like we all do.

[higher4hockey]

i was in a debate one time in college, it was for an ethics class, and the debate was whether or not women should be allowed in combat. i was on the side of no women should not be allowed in combat. i am all for womens rights and things of that nature, i just think that women and men together in battle is just a bad idea all around. if they were in seperate units, sure that'd be fine. i've known some hard as chewed gum females in my time in the military...but anyways.... the day of the debate comes around, im all prepared and ready to rock and roll, i get up in front of the class and look around and realize that im in a class of thirty with only about four males. long story short, it was very heated arguement as far as the females were concerned, and i lost. bad.

[birdgirl73]

I like debates, as most folks who know me know. I also like being persuaded by logic and having my mind changed when I'm debating someone who knows what he's doing. To me it's even more fun to sit on debate panels and watch law students or speech students debate and see who wins according to the rules.

Arguing back and forth gets tiresome. I see arguing and debating as two fairly different things.

[Blitzed]

I like to argue with people who can argue. I hate arguing with people who cant argue, I'd rather bash my head in with a rock..


arguement video!

[YOUTUBE]http://youtube.com/watch?v=5XNQeAV5SnU[/YOUTUBE]

[psteve]

So would you enter an argument knowing ahead of time that your position was going to be undefendable?
This is such an odd thread.

No, but someone who likes to argue might.
I do however routinely argue with people who not only won't change their position, but also feel that they need no evidence to back their position.
They are called prohibitionists.

[psteve]

or christians.

No, christians can usually be convinced that cannabis prohibition is out of control, therefore they are more rational than prohibitionists.

[psteve]

it depends what your arguing with em about O_o

prohibition > they may become rational
religeon > theres no way you can smack ANY sense into them

I won't argue about religion, so it doesn't matter.

[King Cannabis]

No, but someone who likes to argue might.
I do however routinely argue with people who not only won't change their position, but also feel that they need no evidence to back their position.
They are called prohibitionists.

seriously

[psteve]

Word.