George Bush should be tried for murder.

[psychocat]

[QUOTE=dreadhed]

Religion is elitism.[/QUote
Hows that???????????

Simple really
They all profess to being THE path to follow and any other way is inferior or evil.
Heirachy exists even within religion.

[dreadhed]

You can't just label everybody that disagrees with you a liberal and then say that all liberals do is hurl insults. What 'insults' have been 'hurled' by the 'young liberals' on this thread? Of course you'll get some pricks from both sides of the argument who only know how to defend their point of view with namecalling. You have no idea what the political views/age/religion/sexual preference anybody else on this board has and cannot very well call them all young bastard liberals.

You make some interesting claims. First i'll say that neither the rebuplicans or democrats are very good at running the country, the way I see it they're both corrupt and a democracy where people vote between only two parties is complete bullshit.
You say they found weapons of mass destruction: do you have any sources to back this up?
I have been able to find plenty stating otherwise.
Lack of weapons of mass destruction comes back to haunt Bush
No WMDs in Iraq

Election was rigged and stolen

Liberal media?
The US has a liberal media
It's the media, stupid!
The myth of the liberal media

Religion could be considered elitism, because, if you havn't noticed religious people often tend to think that their beliefs are correct and above those of others. Christian have also made the claim that they're religion and god was one and true, and being the majority in a free country such as america they think that acknowledgement of their god should be seen in school, court houses, inauguration prayers etc.

Any thing could be considered elitism. Some one can't just say a religon it elitist just becuse they don't belive in it. Evey group has their assholes. There are even some on this site. The 2 party system does suck though can't argue there at all. I'm just wondering where all the anger comes from for Bush & doesn't include Clinton. He was the 3rd most warring Pres. in our history (I'll have to look that up to make sure I got the number right). It was even on the national news for about 2 secs that they found WMDs. But then they forgot all about it because we do have a bias liberal madia. A good book to check out is Bias. I can't rember the author right now, but if ya want I can get it for you. So how many sourses do you want. Here is what I got in about 1 min off google.

http://wwhttp://www.greatestjenerati...TICLE_ID=40754
www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,120137,00.html
www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,120268,00.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story...120720,00.html
www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4997808/
www.phrusa.org/research/ chemical_weapons/chemiraqgas2.html
http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/meast/9806/....nerve.gas.02/

I would just like to make one last point. Name calling is for the immature. Insults have been hurrled by both sides and that does no one any good. pcychocat is really good at that. Just cause you dissagree with someone doesn't make them inferer to you. Also the discussiones get no where. I guess petty people online crack me up because most are scared in real, who would never insult someone like that to their face, & if they do then they have no respect.

[mr chinnery]

also,young liberals,have little life experience and tend to follow and spout,whatever the current liberal mantra is,without question.

Yeah, that definitely seems to be the case. I don't know about the states but in the UK, folk like that are sometimes called 'trendy lefties'. People such as Lenny Henry, Tony Robinson, Mick Hucknall et al.
It seems to be some sort of 'rebellion' by the young against the conservative forces. I also agree with you about liberal's complete inability to string a coherent argument together.

As P.J. O' Rourke said, "The principle feature of American liberalism is sanctimoniousness. By loudly denouncing all bad things -- war and hunger and date rape -- liberals testify to their own terrific goodness. More important, they promote themselves to membership in a self-selecting elite of those who care deeply about such things. It's a kind of natural aristocracy, and the wonderful thing about this aristocracy is that you don't have to be brave, smart, strong or even lucky to join it, you just have to be liberal."
(From http://en.thinkexist.com/quotation/t...is/325638.html)

[psychocat]

What is it with this obsession for "liberals" ????
I would in no way describe myself in that way , my political standpoint is more right wing than anything else.
Yet I do not for one minute believe the US has anyone but their own interests at heart .
Bush and his military intelligence (oxymoron if ever there was one) got it wrong and started a war on a "percieved" threat , does that mean that if I think someone wants to harm me I can kill them??
I don't consider myself better than anyone but then nor do I ever feel inferior.

[Torog]

What is it with this obsession for "liberals" ????
I would in no way describe myself in that way , my political standpoint is more right wing than anything else.
Yet I do not for one minute believe the US has anyone but their own interests at heart .
Bush and his military intelligence (oxymoron if ever there was one) got it wrong and started a war on a "percieved" threat , does that mean that if I think someone wants to harm me I can kill them??
I don't consider myself better than anyone but then nor do I ever feel inferior.

Howdy psychocat,

I'm not obsessed with liberals, I'm just aware of the damage that they are trying to do to family values,their exploitation of children and their desire for a socialist country,I'm aware of their opposition to religion-Christianity,in particular,their loathing of America and the military,their consorting with the enemies of the Free World,etc.

As for President Bush,it is his sworn oath,to protect the interests and safety of America and Americans,as it is,for all presidents. If he believed that Iraq,or someone or something in Iraq,was a threat,then he acted accordingly..with unanimous approval,from all 15 members of the UN Security Council. Bush would have acted without approval-if he didn't have time for their approval-because that is his job to do so.

You think that the president shouldn't act on percieved threat..that he should gamble with American lives..if you thought that a hundred thousand Americans were going to die,if you were wrong and the percieved threat became a reality,would you tell Americans,that before you will act to protect them-that the enemy must strike the first blow ?

We cannot afford to give the enemy the benefit of the doubt-because they have said that they will use wmd's against ourr population..they've laid their cards on the table..and now it's time to play out the hand..and we will win-with or without ,the support of liberal Americans.

Have a good one...Torog

[psychocat]

Howdy psychocat,

I'm not obsessed with liberals, I'm just aware of the damage that they are trying to do to family values,their exploitation of children and their desire for a socialist country,I'm aware of their opposition to religion-Christianity,in particular,their loathing of America and the military,their consorting with the enemies of the Free World,etc.

As for President Bush,it is his sworn oath,to protect the interests and safety of America and Americans,as it is,for all presidents. If he believed that Iraq,or someone or something in Iraq,was a threat,then he acted accordingly..with unanimous approval,from all 15 members of the UN Security Council. Bush would have acted without approval-if he didn't have time for their approval-because that is his job to do so.

You think that the president shouldn't act on percieved threat..that he should gamble with American lives..if you thought that a hundred thousand Americans were going to die,if you were wrong and the percieved threat became a reality,would you tell Americans,that before you will act to protect them-that the enemy must strike the first blow ?

We cannot afford to give the enemy the benefit of the doubt-because they have said that they will use wmd's against ourr population..they've laid their cards on the table..and now it's time to play out the hand..and we will win-with or without ,the support of liberal Americans.

Have a good one...Torog

The problem is that others have died for a percieved threat that turned out to be non-existant.

[juggalo420]

I'm not obsessed with liberals, I'm just aware of the damage that they are trying to do to family values,their exploitation of children and their desire for a socialist country,I'm aware of their opposition to religion-Christianity,in particular,their loathing of America and the military,their consorting with the enemies of the Free World,etc.

*yes my plan is to fuck with you and your family, ill do that by letting gays marry and providing abortions on demand.
*expoitation of children, how? dont rich republican ceo's own sweat shops in south-east asia.
*i also consult with americas sworn enemies , such as the dreaded french, we play a game of poker and talk about how we can further our goal of pissing off redneck americans.
*your on the ball today torog, i definitly want to destroy our military, you know i and other liberals take pleasure in seeing our troops die in iraq.
*and you also know about the socialist revolutions that lay in wait, ALL HAIL MARX.

Torog, buddy, you need to lay off what ever your on (coke/bible) your paranoid. Live and let live, no liberal is trying to hurt you or your family, how are people getting abortions effect you? how would gays marrying harm you?
heres a deal you keep your bible, 2 ton monument of the ten commandments, and belief in god, and liberals willl leave you the fuck alone. but in return you have to deal with the fact your neighbors will be gay, non-white, jesus hating, communist, atheists.

[Nullific]

Is there any likelihood that these weapons (mustard gas) were left over from the 80s. You know, the ones we gave to Iraq to use against Iran?
http://www.belleville.com/mld/newsdemocrat/5674107.htm
Im still not too sure about this "liberal media"...for example I live in a blue state and recently on the local Fox news they were doing a story about how a school in my state wants to start random drug testing on students. They let all the concerned soccer moms have their say, and then let the ACLU have its say...however, the representative of the ACLU could only get in a couple words before they got cut off.

[Nullific]

Hey look Torog, I HAVE PICTURES NOW TOO!

"I'm so sick of arming the world, then sending troops over to destroy the fucking arms, you know what I mean? We keep arming these little countries, then we go and blow the shit out of them. We're like the bullies of the world, y'know. We're like Jack Palance in the movie Shane, throwing the pistol at the sheepherder's feet.

"Pick it up."

"I don't wanna pick it up, Mister, you'll shoot me."

"Pick up the gun."

"Mister, I don't want no trouble. I just came downtown here to get some hard rock candy for my kids, some gingham for my wife. I don't even know what gingham is, but she goes through about ten rolls a week of that stuff. I ain't looking for no trouble, Mister."

"Pick up the gun."

(He picks it up. Three shots ring out.)

"You all saw him - he had a gun." - Bill Hicks

[psychocat]

So guys now you know , if someone so much as looks at you strangely you can shoot them dead because they could be a threat , it must be okay because the american president does it.