obviously those with a high number of posts are going to have a personal bias against it. I don't care for post counts. It is not a reliable indicator of a person's credibility. It is often an indication of how much time someone spends on their ass, and an indicator of how eager they are to rally up their count with useless posts. Maybe there should be a system in which the counts are directly related to rep points. i.e. it wouldn't count as a numbered post unless others approved it as a meaningful posts. Either way, I will only attempt to deliver concise, meaningful posts in areas in which I feel I have knowledge, and to cram maximum meaning into the fewest number of posts.