Should cannabis.com members be anti medical marijuana and anti-hemp?

[Markass]

I was just kinda curious how some of you guys felt about this..after all, it's cannabis.com, why the hell would someone come on here and say that people using marijuana just wants to get high?

it just seems that you would see people who want to see the laws changed here..not those advocating against us who use it medically..

Markass Reviewed by Markass on 06-20-2007. Should cannabis.com members be anti medical marijuana and anti-hemp? I was just kinda curious how some of you guys felt about this..after all, it's cannabis.com, why the hell would someone come on here and say that people using marijuana just wants to get high? it just seems that you would see people who want to see the laws changed here..not those advocating against us who use it medically.. Rating: 5

[Jizzle Blizzle420]

huh? have you seen someone on here do this which you speak of?

[M3nt0R]

Those for hemp..

Those for medical...

Those for recreational...

We all share a similar cause.

Those for industrial usage (hemp) have it easiest and most realistic. Low grade, low-thc marijuana that cant' get anyone high to be produced for fiber that's so quick to grow, but so versatile...it's only a matter of time. Two farmers are already suing the DEA over this accordng to NORML i think.

Medical has its benefits and many states already legalized it...progress

Recreational has very little progress but medical progress is indirectly recreational progress.

[sttomassmoker]

zuh? medical marijuana is great but the herb is still mostly moved in bulk by real criminals. The pot clubs in california can only have so much herb at a time, so all the rest hits the streets to regular dealers.

A big problem with getting pot legalized is you can't have a big drug bust without there being hundreds of pounds of marijuana among the cocaine/heroin/methamphetamine.

Pot needs to be legalized and made totally worthless in any monetary value before things are gonna be all good. I don't see that happening.

But anyways, that was a really confusing thread title. I assume you are as baked as me. I am so rambling.

Oh I get it. Yes marijuana has medicinal values. I use it mainly for recreational purposes, though I consider it to be a very good medicine for many everyday ailments.

The only thing people can do is grow more pot. Growing more pot is the answer.

[Markass]

http://boards.cannabis.com/activism/...ml#post1273900

http://boards.cannabis.com/activism/...ml#post1264409

http://boards.cannabis.com/legal/992...ml#post1202631

http://boards.cannabis.com/activism/...ml#post1161935

http://boards.cannabis.com/medicinal...ml#post1104996

http://boards.cannabis.com/current-e...ml#post1487606

It may just be so much that he reminds me of the replies I have received from my legislators when I ask them their position? I really can't tell you why I get so emotional about it, but I've seen so many people go to jail because people like that say that because it doesn't help them it doesn't help anyone...it's b/s

[Markass]

in the way I live...to me, doing that would be the equivalent of me going into my front yard and digging a shallow hole to shit in...it just temporarily rids of it..it's still there..wait till the wind blows that dirt off of it..well, that probably wont happen on the internet but still...you know.

[Skink]

Pot is medicine in every respect...

[delusionsofNORMALity]

isn't the question your asking really, "should we allow dissenting opinions"? this morning you seem to be advocating the censorship of those who disagree with our pro-legalization stance and that just doesn't sit right with me. this community consists mainly of people who have set a course contrary to the accepted legal standards of behavior and to attempt to penalize anyone for going against our standards seems to be the height of hypocrisy. i've spent the better part of the last half century rebelling against such thought-police tactics, believing that we should be above the use of this sort of weapon, and i would be ashamed of my membership here if we were to instate a policy which would exclude anyone based on their stand for or against MJ prohibition.

[GHoSToKeR]

We should all think whatever we want to. What's with thinking we should all agree on everything? That would be the crap outta me personally.

Edit: Your poll is stupid. Where's the "Members should think whatever the fuck they want" option?

[Skink]

isn't the question your asking really, "should we allow dissenting opinions"? this morning you seem to be advocating the censorship of those who disagree with our pro-legalization stance and that just doesn't sit right with me. this community consists mainly of people who have set a course contrary to the accepted legal standards of behavior and to attempt to penalize anyone for going against our standards seems to be the height of hypocrisy. i've spent the better part of the last half century rebelling against such thought-police tactics, believing that we should be above the use of this sort of weapon, and i would be ashamed of my membership here if we were to instate a policy which would exclude anyone based on their stand for or against MJ prohibition.

Oh crap,,,now I gotta read the thread...