Results 1 to 10 of 60
Hybrid View
-
06-21-2007, 05:30 PM #1
Senior Member
Fact: Joints are not more wasteful
Dont pay too much attention to those THC Transfer rates.. any study that proposes results from old data without explaining methodology should be discounted. They left out alot of factors when testing the transfer rate, and the experiment should be completely redone with new methodology.
Originally Posted by Reefer Rogue
GraziLovesMary Reviewed by GraziLovesMary on . Fact: Joints are not more wasteful Many people believe that joints waste more weed than other techniques such as pipes and bongs. They base this belief on the observation of a larger stream of smoke emitted by the tip of a joint, whereas the bowl has a small thin one. THIS IS BECAUSE THE JOINT IS ALSO BURNING PAPER! This can be proven. If you make a very long, skinny joint, and smoke 1/4 of it, you can carefully unwrap the paper off of it, leaving a long weed stick intact. It has to be very sticky weed to do this. Rating: 5
Advertisements
Similar Threads
-
fat joints vs thin joints
By budbuddy420 in forum Marijuana MethodsReplies: 20Last Post: 12-01-2007, 01:37 AM -
How wasteful are joints?
By Frank_The_Tank in forum Marijuana MethodsReplies: 48Last Post: 03-04-2007, 09:30 AM -
the fact of the day
By partyguy420 in forum GreenGrassForums LoungeReplies: 6Last Post: 12-24-2006, 08:42 PM -
Are Blunts Really Wasteful?
By Profane Motherfucker in forum Marijuana MethodsReplies: 59Last Post: 08-25-2006, 09:34 PM -
A Little Fact
By Asylum JailBreak in forum Other PsychotropicsReplies: 6Last Post: 04-26-2006, 03:11 AM










Register To Reply
Staff Online