Results 21 to 30 of 60
-
06-16-2007, 10:41 PM #21
Senior Member
Fact: Joints are not more wasteful
Exactly...if it's not rolled right or rolled too loose, it will burn away a lot faster. I smoke joints less then blunts and bowls now, but used to a lot back in the day, and if you roll them right, they burn alright.
Originally Posted by LIP
When I'm smoking a blunt that I rolled, sometimes you can't even tell it's lit, because there is such slight embering. I actually don't find blunts to be wasteful at all...at least mine don't really burn anything when I'm not hitting it...it just chills lol.
-
06-17-2007, 12:16 AM #22
Senior Member
Fact: Joints are not more wasteful
one thing with a joint though, is all the resin soaks into the paper so you really burn it twice. there is an art to rolling a joint, and you have to know how to hit them too, i hate fuckers who get the end all soggy!
-
06-17-2007, 01:16 AM #23
Senior Member
Fact: Joints are not more wasteful
I never really thought about it, but indeed, I do bet a lot of the smoke that just burns and rolls of the end is the paper burning...
-
06-17-2007, 03:55 AM #24
Senior Member
Fact: Joints are not more wasteful
what about a joint rolled with clear papers? those burn even slower, and its just the weed burnign there
-
06-17-2007, 03:58 AM #25
Senior Member
Fact: Joints are not more wasteful
I've been smoking pot for well over 35 years.
When I smoke joints or bongs, my sack is gone A LOT faster than when I smoke bowls, or use the volcano.
Plus, I hate the taste and smell of paper smoke.
P.S. on edit: Who cares? The real difference is , what do you enjoy smoking more?!?!
-
06-17-2007, 04:03 AM #26
Senior Member
Fact: Joints are not more wasteful
i just read this but i will repeat it ,for i am high, and i do what i please ....blunts arent wasteful if you hotbox something......that is a true statement, and because its true it renders this post bullshit ...smoke a bong
:rastasmoke:
schlaaaaazeed
-
06-17-2007, 05:29 AM #27
Senior Member
Fact: Joints are not more wasteful
what?????
Originally Posted by JaMakin07
-
06-17-2007, 05:44 AM #28
Member
Fact: Joints are not more wasteful
mannnn im stoned:bigsmoke:
-
06-17-2007, 08:51 AM #29
Senior Member
Fact: Joints are not more wasteful
a stoner comment in every thread haha
Originally Posted by King Cannabis
-
06-17-2007, 06:21 PM #30
Senior Member
Fact: Joints are not more wasteful
Right. I'm not fucking standing for that. That IS NOT the truth, and im not having that left on the boards for people to read. That is bullshit. It's crap, and in no way true.
Originally Posted by thedazn
Either you havnt read anything, or whatever you HAVE read is EXTREMELY WRONG. You'll find after a bit of research that JOINTS actually have a the HIGHEST THC transfer rate, better than pipes bongs AND vapes. Dont litter the boards with excrement. People want to read something and KNOW it's the truth - what you wrote of misinformation.
Advertisements
Similar Threads
-
fat joints vs thin joints
By budbuddy420 in forum Marijuana MethodsReplies: 20Last Post: 12-01-2007, 01:37 AM -
How wasteful are joints?
By Frank_The_Tank in forum Marijuana MethodsReplies: 48Last Post: 03-04-2007, 09:30 AM -
the fact of the day
By partyguy420 in forum GreenGrassForums LoungeReplies: 6Last Post: 12-24-2006, 08:42 PM -
Are Blunts Really Wasteful?
By Profane Motherfucker in forum Marijuana MethodsReplies: 59Last Post: 08-25-2006, 09:34 PM -
A Little Fact
By Asylum JailBreak in forum Other PsychotropicsReplies: 6Last Post: 04-26-2006, 03:11 AM








Register To Reply
Staff Online