Results 1 to 10 of 60
Threaded View
-
06-16-2007, 04:43 AM #4Senior Member
Fact: Joints are not more wasteful
naw man. you have it wrong because of this:
"Many people believe that joints waste more weed than other techniques such as pipes and bongs. They base this belief on the observation of a larger stream of smoke emitted by the tip of a joint, whereas the bowl has a small thin one."
The reason I think joints are more wasteful is because they are constantly burning, even when you arent hitting them. at least with me and my friends hitting the bowl until its stopped burning is kinda common sense, sometimes you can't keep hitting it but thats like maybe 1/5 hits. so most of the time there is no smoke wasted with a bowl.
Similar Threads
-
fat joints vs thin joints
By budbuddy420 in forum Marijuana MethodsReplies: 20Last Post: 12-01-2007, 01:37 AM -
How wasteful are joints?
By Frank_The_Tank in forum Marijuana MethodsReplies: 48Last Post: 03-04-2007, 09:30 AM -
the fact of the day
By partyguy420 in forum GreenGrassForums LoungeReplies: 6Last Post: 12-24-2006, 08:42 PM -
Are Blunts Really Wasteful?
By Profane Motherfucker in forum Marijuana MethodsReplies: 59Last Post: 08-25-2006, 09:34 PM -
A Little Fact
By Asylum JailBreak in forum Other PsychotropicsReplies: 6Last Post: 04-26-2006, 03:11 AM