Results 21 to 30 of 60
Hybrid View
-
06-16-2007, 10:41 PM #1Senior Member
Fact: Joints are not more wasteful
Originally Posted by LIP
When I'm smoking a blunt that I rolled, sometimes you can't even tell it's lit, because there is such slight embering. I actually don't find blunts to be wasteful at all...at least mine don't really burn anything when I'm not hitting it...it just chills lol.MacWQ33 Reviewed by MacWQ33 on . Fact: Joints are not more wasteful Many people believe that joints waste more weed than other techniques such as pipes and bongs. They base this belief on the observation of a larger stream of smoke emitted by the tip of a joint, whereas the bowl has a small thin one. THIS IS BECAUSE THE JOINT IS ALSO BURNING PAPER! This can be proven. If you make a very long, skinny joint, and smoke 1/4 of it, you can carefully unwrap the paper off of it, leaving a long weed stick intact. It has to be very sticky weed to do this. Rating: 5
-
06-17-2007, 12:16 AM #2Senior Member
Fact: Joints are not more wasteful
one thing with a joint though, is all the resin soaks into the paper so you really burn it twice. there is an art to rolling a joint, and you have to know how to hit them too, i hate fuckers who get the end all soggy!
-
06-17-2007, 01:16 AM #3Senior Member
Fact: Joints are not more wasteful
I never really thought about it, but indeed, I do bet a lot of the smoke that just burns and rolls of the end is the paper burning...
-
06-17-2007, 03:55 AM #4Senior Member
Fact: Joints are not more wasteful
what about a joint rolled with clear papers? those burn even slower, and its just the weed burnign there
-
06-17-2007, 03:58 AM #5Senior Member
Fact: Joints are not more wasteful
I've been smoking pot for well over 35 years.
When I smoke joints or bongs, my sack is gone A LOT faster than when I smoke bowls, or use the volcano.
Plus, I hate the taste and smell of paper smoke.
P.S. on edit: Who cares? The real difference is , what do you enjoy smoking more?!?!
-
06-17-2007, 04:03 AM #6Senior Member
Fact: Joints are not more wasteful
i just read this but i will repeat it ,for i am high, and i do what i please ....blunts arent wasteful if you hotbox something......that is a true statement, and because its true it renders this post bullshit ...smoke a bong
:rastasmoke:
schlaaaaazeed
-
06-17-2007, 05:29 AM #7Senior Member
Fact: Joints are not more wasteful
Originally Posted by JaMakin07
-
06-17-2007, 05:44 AM #8Member
Fact: Joints are not more wasteful
mannnn im stoned:bigsmoke:
-
06-17-2007, 08:51 AM #9Senior Member
Fact: Joints are not more wasteful
Originally Posted by King Cannabis
-
06-17-2007, 06:21 PM #10Senior Member
Fact: Joints are not more wasteful
Originally Posted by thedazn
Either you havnt read anything, or whatever you HAVE read is EXTREMELY WRONG. You'll find after a bit of research that JOINTS actually have a the HIGHEST THC transfer rate, better than pipes bongs AND vapes. Dont litter the boards with excrement. People want to read something and KNOW it's the truth - what you wrote of misinformation.
Advertisements
Similar Threads
-
fat joints vs thin joints
By budbuddy420 in forum Marijuana MethodsReplies: 20Last Post: 12-01-2007, 01:37 AM -
How wasteful are joints?
By Frank_The_Tank in forum Marijuana MethodsReplies: 48Last Post: 03-04-2007, 09:30 AM -
the fact of the day
By partyguy420 in forum GreenGrassForums LoungeReplies: 6Last Post: 12-24-2006, 08:42 PM -
Are Blunts Really Wasteful?
By Profane Motherfucker in forum Marijuana MethodsReplies: 59Last Post: 08-25-2006, 09:34 PM -
A Little Fact
By Asylum JailBreak in forum Other PsychotropicsReplies: 6Last Post: 04-26-2006, 03:11 AM