Activity Stream
227,828 MEMBERS
11185 ONLINE
greengrassforums On YouTube Subscribe to our Newsletter greengrassforums On Twitter greengrassforums On Facebook greengrassforums On Google+
banner1

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 60

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1.     
    #1
    Senior Member

    Fact: Joints are not more wasteful

    Quote Originally Posted by LIP
    The art is to roll it so that when your not hitting it the tip is only slightly embering, so little that no smoke comes off of it, and it's not burning away.
    Exactly...if it's not rolled right or rolled too loose, it will burn away a lot faster. I smoke joints less then blunts and bowls now, but used to a lot back in the day, and if you roll them right, they burn alright.

    When I'm smoking a blunt that I rolled, sometimes you can't even tell it's lit, because there is such slight embering. I actually don't find blunts to be wasteful at all...at least mine don't really burn anything when I'm not hitting it...it just chills lol.
    MacWQ33 Reviewed by MacWQ33 on . Fact: Joints are not more wasteful Many people believe that joints waste more weed than other techniques such as pipes and bongs. They base this belief on the observation of a larger stream of smoke emitted by the tip of a joint, whereas the bowl has a small thin one. THIS IS BECAUSE THE JOINT IS ALSO BURNING PAPER! This can be proven. If you make a very long, skinny joint, and smoke 1/4 of it, you can carefully unwrap the paper off of it, leaving a long weed stick intact. It has to be very sticky weed to do this. Rating: 5

  2.   Advertisements

  3.     
    #2
    Senior Member

    Fact: Joints are not more wasteful

    one thing with a joint though, is all the resin soaks into the paper so you really burn it twice. there is an art to rolling a joint, and you have to know how to hit them too, i hate fuckers who get the end all soggy!

  4.     
    #3
    Senior Member

    Fact: Joints are not more wasteful

    I never really thought about it, but indeed, I do bet a lot of the smoke that just burns and rolls of the end is the paper burning...

  5.     
    #4
    Senior Member

    Fact: Joints are not more wasteful

    what about a joint rolled with clear papers? those burn even slower, and its just the weed burnign there

  6.     
    #5
    Senior Member

    Fact: Joints are not more wasteful

    I've been smoking pot for well over 35 years.
    When I smoke joints or bongs, my sack is gone A LOT faster than when I smoke bowls, or use the volcano.
    Plus, I hate the taste and smell of paper smoke.
    P.S. on edit: Who cares? The real difference is , what do you enjoy smoking more?!?!

  7.     
    #6
    Senior Member

    Fact: Joints are not more wasteful

    i just read this but i will repeat it ,for i am high, and i do what i please ....blunts arent wasteful if you hotbox something......that is a true statement, and because its true it renders this post bullshit ...smoke a bong
    :rastasmoke:
    schlaaaaazeed

  8.     
    #7
    Senior Member

    Fact: Joints are not more wasteful

    Quote Originally Posted by JaMakin07
    i just read this but i will repeat it ,for i am high, and i do what i please ....blunts arent wasteful if you hotbox something......that is a true statement, and because its true it renders this post bullshit ...smoke a bong
    what?????

  9.     
    #8
    Member

    Fact: Joints are not more wasteful

    mannnn im stoned:bigsmoke:

  10.     
    #9
    Senior Member

    Fact: Joints are not more wasteful

    Quote Originally Posted by King Cannabis
    mannnn im stoned:bigsmoke:
    a stoner comment in every thread haha

  11.     
    #10
    Senior Member

    Fact: Joints are not more wasteful

    Quote Originally Posted by thedazn
    There have been studies to see the THC conversion for each way of smoking. Joints/Blunts are about 10-15%, Glass Bowls and Bongs are about 15-20%, Vaporizers are about 90-95%. Don't remember where I read that, but its the truth. So case closed, joints waste the most marijuana.
    Right. I'm not fucking standing for that. That IS NOT the truth, and im not having that left on the boards for people to read. That is bullshit. It's crap, and in no way true.

    Either you havnt read anything, or whatever you HAVE read is EXTREMELY WRONG. You'll find after a bit of research that JOINTS actually have a the HIGHEST THC transfer rate, better than pipes bongs AND vapes. Dont litter the boards with excrement. People want to read something and KNOW it's the truth - what you wrote of misinformation.

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. fat joints vs thin joints
    By budbuddy420 in forum Marijuana Methods
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 12-01-2007, 01:37 AM
  2. How wasteful are joints?
    By Frank_The_Tank in forum Marijuana Methods
    Replies: 48
    Last Post: 03-04-2007, 09:30 AM
  3. the fact of the day
    By partyguy420 in forum GreenGrassForums Lounge
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-24-2006, 08:42 PM
  4. Are Blunts Really Wasteful?
    By Profane Motherfucker in forum Marijuana Methods
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 08-25-2006, 09:34 PM
  5. A Little Fact
    By Asylum JailBreak in forum Other Psychotropics
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-26-2006, 03:11 AM
Amount:

Enter a message for the receiver:
BE SOCIAL
GreenGrassForums On Facebook