Well damn, I'd call this enough evidence to convince even my sceptical mind. Not that I really doubted the reslove of Tehran, but I never liked the idea of jumping into a war before sufficient evidence is provided. Sometimes you're right (Iran), sometimes you're wrong (Iraq).

I still say we don't go jumping into a war right off the bat. God knows it was enough of a problem when we sent soldiers into Iraq under-equipped, if war really is necessary then we need to carefully plan everything out and set up a strategy to counter every Iranian counter-attack plausible. They'll definately put up a better fight than Saddam's military.

Right now though, It's time to lay it down on these assholes. I think the UN and NATO now have ample justification for the tightest sanctions and even an outrigh collective western war effort. We need to send Ahmadinejad a clear message right now "we've got you red handed, we have an international force ready to depose you, and you so much as look at us the wrong way and we're coming down on you". No more negotiations, no more giving him a single inch, he can get down on his knees and kiss our western asses with an outright apology. The guy doesn't have a legal leg to stand on.


One has to wonder if invading sovereign nations isn't somehow illegal under international law too.
Dude, we're talking about Iran, not Iraq. And if you are talking about Iran, there's such thing as a legal pretext for war. Considering they're arming enemy militarys, and I'm sure we'll find out they're training them too soon enough, that seems like pretty clear justification to me.