ok yal need to make up your minds... everytime i point out 360 has had a years head start everyone says it doesn't matter, now you're telling me it does matter just cuz this time it's sony with the headstart...?

i still stick with what i have said, but atleast i'm one man enough to admit the machines are equal, performance wise.

yes, it's expensive and it's cuz of the damned blueray drive in it.... a blueray player alone can cost the same as the ps3 does... they fucked up by putting it standard and subsequently drasticly increasing the price... but the price is more than fair. just look up how much a blue ray drive is for pc, or a blueray player...

360 is still like 400 bucks, so ps3 is 200 more... you ain't gonna find any blueray player for 200...
slipknotpsycho Reviewed by slipknotpsycho on . So many Sony fans here...I just have to ask. Why? (Long Read) :wtf: I notice such a large % of gamers on here support the PS3(Sony) over the other consoles. I'm surprisingly shocked. I mean last generation with the PS2, the only thing that held it above the rest of the competition was the fact it had a years head start on everything but the Dreamcast, it had it's namesake to ride on. Third parties were already established on Sonys hardware because the user base was there. And gamers stayed because the third parties were there (vicious circle). The Rating: 5