LOL @ Polymirize

It strikes me with anything deeply philosophical, like the concept of "God", you get so far into analysing it and then you start analysing the semantics of the language you are using. When that happens you begin to lose all sense of objective meaning, which is ultimately an absolute requirement when striving to determine the truth to the existence of somehing like a universal creator. You end up saying things like "All is God" or something, and thus losing the original definition of what god is. It is a valid conjecture to say that "GOD" is the collective MIND of the entire universe, way beyond our limited ability to perceive, but in my opinion that concept is slightly flawed in that life and conciousness appears not to be "designed" in a hierarchical way, more it is a complex web of interconnectness. The expression "All is God" is perhaps valid more from the standpoint of emergent conciousness and being, which can be modelled on contemporary life science based on self-generation. Either way, the original concept of God is lost to be replaced with a new definition, and leads to confusion, as I suspect anything does when we try to anaylise it wihout understanding the subjective nature of thought.