Quote Originally Posted by B.Basher
I nearly said those numbers are irellevant, that was the fool-arse liberal beeyatch coming out. Close call! :thumbsup:

I was waiting for that one.......DAMN, LMAO!:thumbsup:

The thing is, while trying my best to refrain from prioritising figures, the US toll is more of a factor than the Iraqi toll in such an argument. Of course your wasting a fuckload of them everyday, how could you not? That much is certain. In fact, your so ahead of yourself, your taking out the civilians too, good job there Uncle Sam :wtf:..
Yeah, unforturnately civilians die in war zones. Like when a suicide bomber blows himself up in the middle of their market places killing sister Muslims and her children.

If civilian death toll would have been such a huge issue during WW2 we all would have been doing a goose step today. That's one of the problems with this war, we aren't able to fight it like it was a war.....gotta try to stay politically correct for the masses. IF we didn't, this would have been resolved a couple years ago.

Have a good one!:s4:
Psycho4Bud Reviewed by Psycho4Bud on . You can't kill an idealism The one thing I truly don't understand with this Iraq kerfuffle is why those in power think its possible to kill every single terrorist. Like a game of space invaders, they expect to sweep the whole country, taking them all out one at a time until they're all gone. Alright! You win. Time to go home. The fact is, the taliban will never die. Idealisms are passed on, however many insurgents you can nuke and how fast isn't a factor. For every family man/women/child the troops take out, I would Rating: 5