Quote Originally Posted by Zimzum
:hippy: Laughing to Keep from Crying: The Lighter Side of 9/11 Stupidity

"Truth Movement" by Arkan Wolfshade


Take your message to the 'net
Remain steadfast in your conclusions, even in the face of evidence to the contrary
Under no circumstances make a concrete claim
Tell them you are, "Just asking questions"
Hope they don't notice your logical fallacies
Make sure you post lots of pictures
Overlook any evidence that doesn't support your hypothesis
Veil your lack of comprehension by link dumping threads
Evade calls to show your work, for you know you haven't done it
Meddle with quotes so they say what you need
Equate your opponents with shills and mouthpieces
Never admit that you might be wrong
Tell everyone you know, even if they're not interested

You want a real 9/11 debate? try it here. And goodluck with the copy/pasting there :thumbsup:
Dude you fit that to a tee THE OWNER SAID THEY PULLED THE BUILDING.

I admit olf course I could be wrong. I never even made any conclusions in my post I simply presented evidence that building 7 was likely pulled and that BUSH and pals outright lie and make outrageous claims such as "god told me to invade iraq". These are not opinions they are FACTS.

Lets see..

T) you took your message to the net (not likke that means anything)
R) You remain steadfast in your conclusions regtardless of the evidence I presented
U) My concrete claim is that the OWNER of the complex said it was pullked and that bush and pals lied
T)I dont think i asked any questions even if I did that means nothing
H)Please show me my logical fallacies so I can correct them..you on the other hand commited a strawman argument by putting words in my mouth. There was also that slippery slope type fallacy as well in your drivel.
M) I put no picture you posted a tin foil hat
O)show me the evidence im "overlooking"

None of the rest apply and if you think they do tell me how.

Buddy you just OWNED yourself hardcore with that post. :rastasmoke: