If there is one thing Americans aren't afraid of, it's a real fight. Look at people like Torog, just sitting there wishing he could die gloriously in battle after saving his platoon. Americans have some sort of superhero mentality Saying that Americans are a bunch of aggressive, bloodthirsty warmongers, waiting for a reason to kill, but are afraid of battle doesn't really make sense, does it?

till no Americans. WOW I found one , Haviland Pilot Officer J K American 151 , better than none I suppose
Donahue Pilot Officer A G American 64 Killed
Fiske Pilot Officer W M L American 601 Killed*
Haviland Pilot Officer J K American 151
Keough Pilot Officer V C American 609 Killed
Leckrone Pilot Officer P H American 616 Killed
Mamedoff Pilot Officer A American 609 Died
Tobin Pilot Officer E Q American 609 Killed


As for not fighting battles in Europe, the Battle of the Bulge seems like a real fight to me...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_bulge

I believe that Patton was very helpful to the Allies in Europe, do you disagree?

As for the supply of weapons , the US were interested only in making money out of any deals , they didn't do it out of kindness or as an act of support to an ally in times of war. They wanted their pound of flesh , as I said the US is only interested in helping itself.
That doesn??t mean it wasn??t needed. How exactly did the U.S. government profit from the lend lease? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lend_lease

The Marshall plan wasn??t making the gov??t any money, it was an act of kindness. I am not 100% certain about the government not profiting from the Marshall plan, but I am pretty sure. If you know different, please inform me.

and do you really think INDIA is going to be a countries with liberties? hah..i laugh at you, especially becuase you hate the USA becuase of the war in IRAQ, but you faild to not be a hypocrite and hate INDIA over the war in kashmere, or were you to uninformed to make that connection.
Were we on the topic of India? No, we weren??t asshole. Did I ever say I liked the Indian government? Not mentioning India in a discussion about the U.S. and the Iraq war doesn't mean I'm a fan of India you fucking twit.
in the eyes of me, and probally any other person with a grip on reality, you look like a selfish sonofabitch, taking our freedoms for granted, if we were in an opressed country, with a tyrant leader, killing citizens left and right, at will, raping women, living in a constant sense of fear that you may be next, would you want a country to come in and give their OWN LIVES to save you from your hell?
Obviously everyone doesn't think like you, how strange. Iraqi youths are rallying against America at an alarming rate, that tells me that they did not want America to ??liberate?? them. People in other parts of the world don't think like you do. I don't mean that they are pro being tortured or pro extreme censorship, I mean that they have a different way of thinking about how they want to live their lives (like Islamic extremists). I comment more about Americans slaughtering civilians because Americans like you say that we went over there to stop the murdering in Iraq. You should stop acting like the coalition kills no children or innocent citizens.

but we had no right to go in there...right?

WRONG

we had all the right in the world to go in there

they harbor terrorists
they kill innocent citizens, one reason you hate america, but when iraq kills them by the dosens is ok isnt it? because they arent a WESTERN country..
we had a very good idea that there was a possibility of WOMD, we were wrong, but i guess saving the lives of millions of iraquis are no consolation...
"They Harbor terrorists"
...and this information came from the same fucking geniuses in the White House who told you that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction? Guess what, by ??protecting our selves from the terrorists in Iraq? (which there were very few of) we have created hundreds of thousands more terrorists. Big brother in the white house may have told you that there were terrorists in Iraq, but maybe you were to ignorant to realize that there were way more terrorists in Israel, Iran, Pakistan, Burma, Brazil, Russia, Albania, Saudi Arabia, Columbia, Kashmir, Uzbekistan, the Philippines, Syria, and many more countries. Many other countries harbor, and Syria even trains, terrorists.
Let??s attack them.
??They kill innocents?
No shit? So does North Korea, China, Burma, The U.S. (on a slightly smaller scale), and A LOT of other countries. Why don??t we attack all of them (except for us, of course, because we can kill who ever we want and it??s not bad, right?) North Korea is worse than Iraq was (in terms of civil rights violations and executions), and still is, and the threat of nuclear weapons, which most countries suspect Kim Jung-Il has or is pursuing (more reason to suspect than we had about Iraq??s possible possession of chemical weapons, which we now confirmed was incorrect, asshole.) is more dangerous than the threat of chemical weapons, North Korea expelled weapons inspectors, North Korea has shown military aggression like that of Iraq??s and has a significantly more powerful military, why not attack North Korea instead of Iraq? Maybe it was because North Korea doesn??t have such large oil reserves, maybe because it wouldn??t be finishing Bush senior??s old disputes...
In China, there are HUGE numbers of annual executions, many more than the Chinese government confesses to in official reports, and that is common knowledge. There are more than 10 times as many people suffering in China as are/were suffering in Iraq. China has shown aggression such as Iraq??s, and has nuclear weapons...why not attack China if you are so into ??liberating?? people? U.S. corporations (that means George??s rich buddies) make huge amounts of money off of Chinese prison labor and sweat shops, maybe you were to uninformed to make that connection.
http://www.usvetdsp.com/bush_trp.htm http://www.perspicacityonline.com/Ar...ights10302.htm
http://www.christusrex.org/www1/sdc/hr_facts.html
http://www.amnesty.ca/china/

As for who is profiting from the Iraq war: http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=11462
http://www.prwatch.org/node/2793
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=6975
and there are significantly more profiteers ( including ` Michael Moore)

Iraqi citizens are still dying and suffering. The U.S. media doesn??t keep specific track of Iraqi casualties, incase you wanted to know...

Oh yea, and just incase you didn??t know, I am American. I don??t hate every United States citizen (which would include myself) because of the war in Iraq I hate the government, and the people who try to justify the war in Iraq because they are the reason we are in Iraq. I ALSO hate the British government, and Tony Blair for being Bush??s little bitch. I think some of you U.K. asses should stop talking about how we are so horrible for starting this war, when you are our biggest ally in the war. Torog, and all of you hick assholes should stop calling Europeans retarded 8th grade insults like ??Euroweenies? and talking shit about how ??prissy? you think the Brits are. Do you want them to stop helping us? When John Kerry said this war was unilateral you immediately starting spouting your shit about how he is insulting our allies, then you went and did the same thing. You talk about how you are being sympathetic and care about the Iraqis and how you ??liberated them to stop their suffering because you care about your fellow man? and then you call them stupid racist, bullshit insults like ??dunecoons, camel jockey, sandniggers.? Not to mention that Great Britain doesn??t exactly have a clean past.
As for your comments on pacifism, I am not pacifist. I am on probation for possession and assault/battery. I do believe unnecessary wars are not a good thing, that war should not be used to profit one or a handful of individuals that are not doing the fighting, or to make some megalomaniac asshole feel big and strong. But there are some people who would have strongly disagreed with you on pacifism only being good in theory or war being something declared so quickly and easily.

??What difference does it make to the dead, the orphans, and the homeless, whether the mad destruction is wrought under the name of totalitarianism or the holy name of liberty and democracy??

- Gandhi

??Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and not clothed.?

- Dwight D. Eisenhower

??Surely a civilization that can develop supercomputers and send men safely to the moon and bring them back is smart enough to cease the killing of its own kind and the destruction of the accomplishments of previous generations. The only thing necessary is for the present mindset of people to change??all else will follow.?

-James M. Carroll

??Violence is the first refuge of the incompetent?

- Issac Asimov


As for Nowhere Man:
like you never insulted my nations honor when it in fact STOPPED THE WORST GENOCIDE EVER SEEN
The worst genocide ever seen I think would have to be the Soviet Gulag, and we did not stop that.
Sedater18 Reviewed by Sedater18 on . Should the U.S. have began started the current war in Iraq Simple poll, yes or no? Rating: 5