Quote Originally Posted by Oppositional P
Benjamin Franklin said nothing is certain but death and taxes.

Why am I not getting flamed? What happened people thinking with their glands?
like i said in the last thread, your choice of wordings was the eventual downfall... and you're right, science is always proving old 'scientific proof' to be only half right, or even completely wrong. as someone said tho, with current evidence a logical person is left to conclude it is not addictive, and those who exempt 'addiction attributes' are in fact, just weak-willed people.
slipknotpsycho Reviewed by slipknotpsycho on . Scientific reasoning Ten years ago, the popular belief was that caffeine didn't act on any specific neurotransmitter or receptor site. The popular belief was that caffeine acted by increasing the permeability of calcium on the intracellular level. Fortunately science is not set in stone, so when new evidence presented itself the popular belief changed. It is now believed that caffeine acts mainly through its structural similarity to adenosine, but in another ten years that could go out the window also. This is Rating: 5