Results 1 to 10 of 13
Hybrid View
-
05-11-2007, 02:29 AM #1Senior Member
Scientific reasoning
I disagree that marijuana isn't addictive. I agree that it can become physically addictive. I think that once your body gets a certian thing for a certian amount of times a day for a certian amount of years, that when you stop giving your body that specific thing..it kind of spazzes out..i.e headaches, stomach aches, ect.
I don't think it's like crack though, or any seriously hard drug in the sense that you literally go thru vomitting, shakes, cold sweats, ect. which is why you'll often see me saying "Weed is not crack." when little shits go about posting "omggg i'm sooo dry ommgg i'm freaking out.."
I agree with you though, science is a nutty thing.BabyFacedAbortion Reviewed by BabyFacedAbortion on . Scientific reasoning Ten years ago, the popular belief was that caffeine didn't act on any specific neurotransmitter or receptor site. The popular belief was that caffeine acted by increasing the permeability of calcium on the intracellular level. Fortunately science is not set in stone, so when new evidence presented itself the popular belief changed. It is now believed that caffeine acts mainly through its structural similarity to adenosine, but in another ten years that could go out the window also. This is Rating: 5
Advertisements
Similar Threads
-
Scientific soil ?
By Ckd1309 in forum Indoor GrowingReplies: 0Last Post: 05-03-2013, 04:13 PM -
Whats the reasoning behind no edit after 5mins...
By SmurfyBH in forum Feedback and SuggestionsReplies: 10Last Post: 02-24-2006, 02:31 PM -
Scientific Explanations
By WannaSmokePot in forum Marijuana MethodsReplies: 7Last Post: 02-01-2006, 05:25 PM -
Lets get scientific
By YoungSmoker313 in forum GreenGrassForums LoungeReplies: 7Last Post: 07-11-2005, 01:40 AM