Results 1 to 10 of 13
Hybrid View
-
05-10-2007, 11:05 PM #1
Senior Member
Scientific reasoning
Very well said, I won't argue against possible future findings, but based on the info we currently have, I still would have to go with it not being addictive.
Even if new findings were to be released, I don't think many would suffer from an addiction to cannabis, as it doesn't appear many are addicted. As stated before most of those in drug rehab for cannabis is at the order of the court.JaggedEdge Reviewed by JaggedEdge on . Scientific reasoning Ten years ago, the popular belief was that caffeine didn't act on any specific neurotransmitter or receptor site. The popular belief was that caffeine acted by increasing the permeability of calcium on the intracellular level. Fortunately science is not set in stone, so when new evidence presented itself the popular belief changed. It is now believed that caffeine acts mainly through its structural similarity to adenosine, but in another ten years that could go out the window also. This is Rating: 5
Advertisements
Similar Threads
-
Scientific soil ?
By Ckd1309 in forum Indoor GrowingReplies: 0Last Post: 05-03-2013, 04:13 PM -
Whats the reasoning behind no edit after 5mins...
By SmurfyBH in forum Feedback and SuggestionsReplies: 10Last Post: 02-24-2006, 02:31 PM -
Scientific Explanations
By WannaSmokePot in forum Marijuana MethodsReplies: 7Last Post: 02-01-2006, 05:25 PM -
Lets get scientific
By YoungSmoker313 in forum GreenGrassForums LoungeReplies: 7Last Post: 07-11-2005, 01:40 AM










Register To Reply
Staff Online