Would you still be a stoner if you ate weed?

[geonagual]

No pipes
no bong
No joints
No vaporizer
can do it anywhere
no smoke
barely an odor.
So, would you still be a stoner?

or something else?

geonagual Reviewed by geonagual on 05-09-2007. Would you still be a stoner if you ate weed? No pipes no bong No joints No vaporizer can do it anywhere no smoke barely an odor. So, would you still be a stoner? or something else? Rating: 5

[reality0]

you wouldn't be high... unless of course u cooked it

[TheGreenFog]

I think he meant cooking it, right Geo? Well, you sure as hell would be stoned...so I guess if you call yourself a stoner when you smoke, why wouldn't you be one when you were stoned off some brownies. You'd just smell like roses instead of weed mixed with Febreeze.


The Fog :rastasmoke:

[orangeman]

If you still enjoyed the effects of THC and did it a lot you'd be considered a stoner. It's not the way you use it, it's what it does.

[orangeman]

Nice avatar Orange.

Being a stoner is overrated.

Thanks, same to you...and yes it is lol.

[Matt the Funk]

Still be a stoner.

[geonagual]

Nice avatar Orange.

Being a stoner is overrated.

who overrates it?

[make it legal]

Haha yeah man I was pretty sure most people think of it as a bad thing. How is it overrated exactly?

[make it legal]

Oh and yeah you still would be one.

Woohoo for post 1,420

Didn't even notice till likw 2 seconds ago but yeah.

[mfqr]

First of all, why would you worry if you'd still be considered a stoner or not? Baking weed properly into some brownies or whatever would get you way higher than if you smoked it. I guess most people just associate "stoners" with people who smoke it, and not cook with it.