Results 1 to 10 of 10
Hybrid View
-
05-10-2007, 02:46 AM #1
Senior Member
HIGH COURT WONâ??T HEAR MICHAEL NEWâ??S CASE
Well here's the way I see it. I don't care about the uniform and I understand the problems of not having protected status. But for this guy to decide on his own that he's not going to follow certain orders because "they weren't in his oath" is a bunch of bs. Was eating meals in the oath? He figured that one out didn't he? Unlawful orders aside....which I completely agree with....he agreed to do a job so go do it.
Weedhound Reviewed by Weedhound on . HIGH COURT WONâ??T HEAR MICHAEL NEWâ??S CASE HIGH COURT WONâ??T HEAR MICHAEL NEWâ??S CASE Are Supreme Court Justices Too Timid To Battle for Americaâ??s Sovereignty? By Daniel New Even if you attended government schools, you may well remember that event in history. An ancient Roman law forbade any general to enter the republic of Rome with a standing armyâ??and the small Rubicon River was one of those borders. When Julius Caesar returned from his conquests of Gaul and Britain, he was Rating: 5
Advertisements
Similar Threads
-
PNG executivefails in bid to stymie court case
By norakitty123 in forum Medicinal Cannabis and HealthReplies: 1Last Post: 10-23-2011, 05:18 AM -
Wa Supremes To Hear Case
By gypski in forum Washington (WA)Replies: 3Last Post: 04-03-2010, 04:36 AM -
MMJ Court Case
By killerweed420 in forum Washington (WA)Replies: 12Last Post: 03-25-2009, 07:39 PM -
High court hears 'Bong hits 4 Jesus' case
By Tokudai in forum Current EventsReplies: 10Last Post: 03-22-2007, 10:52 PM -
Supreme Court to hear Partial Birth Abortion Case
By amsterdam in forum PoliticsReplies: 3Last Post: 02-22-2006, 05:46 AM










Register To Reply
Staff Online