" Ron Paul is the only real candidate talking about real issues and he is also the only contender who is not completely bought and paid for by Neo-Con warmongers.
That's the part I like about Ron Paul, that and his freedoms for individuals thingy, his drug policies, or lack of drug laws. The things I don't like are his contention that everything would be better off privatized and that privitization would make this a better country and that private charities would take care of the poor, sort of like 16th century europe where there were beggars in the streets. Take a look at Corporate America if you want to see privitization in action, Greed piled upon Greed, there is never enough profit and greedy CEOs are cutting costs (Jobs) to maximize profit so their cut goes up. The max privitization is the main thing that holds me back from libertarians, No safety nets, no controls on polution, no unionization, no workers rights, no medical plans, just the individuals right to do as he pleases. Sometimes individuals do things that fuck over a lot of other people subversly, like eliminating polution controls, or job safety regulations. I'm not for a nanny state, but letting the corporations run roughshod over the land and people will not make this country a better place to live, unless you own major stock in the corporation, in otherwords, Libertarianism will benefit the Rich, and fuck the middle and poor even more than the Repubes do now.