Quote Originally Posted by Zohar
Actually that is consider bad form, when constructing polls it is almost always done to specifically eliminate bias questions, they skew poll results and thus make them unreliable. The type of poll taken from USA Today would definately work to eliminate bias, they are a reputable source and to use biased questions would hurt their credibility (believe it or not).

Here's the difference between a bias question and an unbiased one:

(Unbiased) Do you approve of the President's handling of the war on terror? Yes/ No/Uncertain

(Biased) Do you approve of the President's poor handling of the war on terror? Yes/No/Uncertain

Now look at the question's above on the poll, draw you're own logical conclusions.

Edit: I see that the original questions are not listed, so you cannot come to any logical conclusions from the given. USA Today / Bloomberg and *gasp* even Fox News are reputable news sources regardless of your views on them. If you do doubt the polls, why don't you review the sources, they are given above. If it's so hard to believe that the American public actually feel the way that's stated above then perhaps you are disillusioned.
Disillusioned, maybe I'm the only one seeing it clearly. The war is lost. The only reason we are still there is the oil. As was reported by the Fishman, when the new bill passes in the Iraqi parliment, the US oil companies will own 80% of the Iraqi oil reserves, was there ever any question as to why we went there? This "save the Iraqis from Sadam" was a giant smoke screen that even a pre-schooler could have seen through. All you neo-cons that are beating:beatdeadhorse: Should grow up and see the real deal!