Obama goes rude on Rudy

[Psycho4Bud]

Good point P4B, until you look at the death toll

Clinton's Watch
The First WTC Attack
Khobar Towers
U.S. embassies in Nairobi, Kenya, and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
USS Cole
Total deaths 268

Bush's Watch
9/11 Attack
Total Deaths 2,997

Not that the deaths of American's is anything to laugh about, but, in your own words, "LOL"

I guess Clinton should have nipped it in the bud instead of de-budding the nymph.

Have a good one!:s4:

Psycho4Bud Reviewed by Psycho4Bud on 04-27-2007. Obama goes rude on Rudy WASHINGTON -- Democratic presidential candidates on Wednesday rebuked Republican rival Rudy Giuliani for suggesting that the United States could face another major terrorist attack if a Democrat is elected in 2008. Illinois Sen. Barack Obama said the former New York City mayor, who was in charge on Sept. 11, 2001, should not be making the terrorist threat into ''the punchline of another political attack.'' ''Rudy Giuliani today has taken the politics of fear to a new low and I believe Rating: 5

[Psycho4Bud]

A lot of that was on Rudys watch and he still kept headquarters in the World trade towers without doing anything to make it safer. Rudy is a stagnate Joke!

Now we get a rude and a reckless
We been seen lookin' cool an' a speckless
We been drinking brew for breakfast
Rudie can't fail oh, no, no:thumbsup:

Have a good one!:s4:

[Fengzi]

Honestly Psycho, the bottom line is that it really doesn't make a difference who is in the White House and who is in control of Congress. 9/11 would have happened if Gore had gotten the votes in 2000...um, well..you know what I mean, and it would have happened if it was a Republican president that Monica had been blowing instead of Clinton for the 8 years prior. And if you don't believe that you're a fool. Just like all the fools that re-elected Bush based on the same fear mongering back in 2004.

So, if we want another President who appeals to the idiots of America (ever notice that the areas with top universities, top research, top hi-tech, in other words, places where smart people live, are predominantly blue?) then go ahead and vote for another fear monger. You'll get what you deserve.

[Psycho4Bud]

So, if we want another President who appeals to the idiots of America (ever notice that the areas with top universities, top research, top hi-tech, in other words, places where smart people live, are predominantly blue?) then go ahead and vote for another fear monger. You'll get what you deserve.

Land of the Free, Home of the Brave..........let the aristocrats have the say and fuck the rest! LOL.........UNREAL!

Remember dude, the "smart" ones voted for it before they voted against it.

Have a good one!:s4:

[Fengzi]

Say what you want Psycho, but as of last count, Dubya was responsible for the deaths of about 400 more Americans than Osama was.

[Psycho4Bud]

Say what you want Psycho, but as of last count, Dubya was responsible for the deaths of about 400 more Americans than Osama was.

Granted, he could have sat back on his thumb and waited for the inevitable but instead decided to take action.

Who's really responsible for the deaths? Who's supplying the IEDs? I find it VERY strange on how we degrade our own but yet don't speak up about those like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

We CAN'T go back into time and honestly state whether or not a republican president would have handled it better than Billy boy BUT he did sit on his ass during all those attacks.

Have a good one!:s4:

[Fengzi]

Granted, he could have sat back on his thumb and waited for the inevitable but instead decided to take action. :

Yeah, it's just too bad he took it in the wrong country. Oops

Who's really responsible for the deaths? Who's supplying the IEDs? I find it VERY strange on how we degrade our own but yet don't speak up about those like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. :

Does it really matter who's supplying the IED's? It was Dubya who sent those kids to die for his own little cause. But yeah, Ahmadinejad's a bad guy who should be kept on a very short leash. Especially now that the world has seen what happens when you give a bad guy control of the world's most powerful military and don't keep him under control.

Have a good one!:s4:

You too .

[fishman3811]

Anyway guys the conservatives are done in 2008.Many Americans are waking up to realize what a big mistake this war has become and the will of the people are being ignored again.Any politician that wants to increase the troop levels in Iraq wont have a chance come election time.The majority of Americans want the troops home now.

[Psycho4Bud]

Anyway guys the conservatives are done in 2008.Many Americans are waking up to realize what a big mistake this war has become and the will of the people are being ignored again.Any politician that wants to increase the troop levels in Iraq wont have a chance come election time.The majority of Americans want the troops home now.

LOL..........when the dems lose the Presidential race and either the House or Senate will you be willing to eat a big ol' plate of crow? LMAO!!!

Have a good one!:s4:

[JackdaWack]

Yeah can we really sit here saying that the 8 years clinton was in the house was on the offensive of terrorism. NO we cant! the entire time he was in office, though it was good for our economy, well set us up for much worse circumstances for the future as we can see.

I think democrats are a on a totally different level then republicans obviously, and i would rather have a person in office willing to adhere to the situation rather then just pull troops out of the mid east. What a bad idea. Its exactly was P4b said, it would be like us waving a white flag. I think we need to do alot more before we decided to just take troops out, the shit bush says why we keep them there right now, maybe hes a retard in his statements but its not far from the truth that pulling out right now is a bad idea.
We cant leave the countries with such bad infrastructures, that would leave them worse off then before, and us aswell.