Quote Originally Posted by xblackdogx
i DEFINITELY oppose organized religion as we know it,
but given the infinite possiblities on the smallest level (quan physics) and the complexities of humans (and everything in natue) juxtaposed with E=mc^2 and all the UNKNOWNS,
it's pretty safe to say that everything that is probably has a creator
Wait, what? What does quantum mechanics have to do with a creator? What do the complexities created by Darwinian natural selection have to do with a creator? And what does relativity have to do with a creator? To me, all this looks like powerful evidence that the universe is mindless, following strict mathematical rules that break down to probabilistic functions on a small scale. The universe, so far as we can tell, is deterministic with the exception of some randomness at the quantum level.

Most importantly, it is a grave logical fallacy to say "There is something important that's unknown about X, therefore I know the cause of X must be Y." There's lots of shit we don't know because we haven't put the time and mental effort into figuring it out, or because there's just not enough information available to us. In the Middle Ages we hardly knew anything scientific about the universe. Would it therefore have been justifiable for someone in the Middle Ages to say that diseases and earthquakes and the weather and the stars prove the existence of God's intervention, simply because the causes of these things were unknown at the time?