I think you gun grabbers are missing the big picture. The number of people that have been disarmed and massacred by their own governments is exponentially higher than the number of people that have been killed by common criminals armed with guns. The real threat comes from agents of the State, not Jamal mugging you for your wallet. This should be the main focus of any anti-victim-disarmament argument.

That being said, Having a gun on Virginia Tech campus was a crime. Therefore, students couldn't defend themselves. All they could do is call 911 and wait for the cops who stayed outside and hid behind trees instead of trying to find the gunman.

If the students were allowed to be own a firearm the casualities would be reduced greatly.
pwn3dy0 Reviewed by pwn3dy0 on . gun control (really) LEAVE OUT INSULTS, MAKE YOUR ARGUMENT, BUT BE CIVIL. i made this thread cuz it's obvious everyone has their peice to speak on this, especially after today's events. so bring those arguments here... from this point on, lets leave the VT thread alone, other then to express condolonces or share stories relating to it (family members, friends, ect directly involved in the event) there's a good possibility alot of people lost someone today, and that thread shouldn't be continually litered with Rating: 5