Quote Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
Like I've stated before, take your choice:

1) Complete isolationism; close off all borders and trade with the middle east, anybody of the Muslim faith in the U.S. currently speaking hate will be deported.

2) Inform each country in the middle east to clean up it's backyard of these assclowns or here comes the stone age. NO exceptions! No need for troops on the ground.......just take out the entire infrastructure.(My own personal choice.......I knew you'd be confused as to which I'd pick):

3) Talk, yap, debate out all this common knowledge shit until things progress to the point that it's unstoppable........i.e. Iran/Nukes...this will ultimately be the decision.:wtf:

Have a good one!:s4:
So.... It's isolationism or the bomb. I guess if I had to make a choice, I'd go with isolationism, but I'd rather see an intelligent debate between the opposing parties, sans radicals on both sides. If you see the muslim extremests as radicals, you must by virtue of the confrontational nature of Bushco, see them as radicals also. If the radicals were taken out of the picture, I'm pretty sure you could get some peace deals worked out, IE Nancy Pelosis' intent on her trip. Intelligent men most always view peace as the best solution and only use violence as a last resort. I'm pretty sure that not many will argue that we have both the baddest weapons and the best means of delivery, the key is how to avoid using them.
medicinal Reviewed by medicinal on . Bushs' great Iraq Plan Divide and Rule: Bush's Doomed Plan for Baghdad By Robert Fisk, The Independent. Posted April 12, 2007. Revealed: a new counter-insurgency strategy to carve up the city into sealed areas. The tactic failed in Vietnam. So what chance does it have in Iraq? Faced with an ever-more ruthless insurgency in Baghdad -- despite President George Bush's "surge" in troops -- US forces in the city are now planning a massive and highly controversial counter-insurgency operation that will seal off vast Rating: 5