Quote Originally Posted by Markass
wait wait...so you're saying that America can not be attacked by terrorists so long as we're in a war with Iraq? Fuck that shit. You're wrong :thumbsup:
Iv'e got to agree.We are going to get to a point where our military resources in Iraq,Afganastan,maybe Iran soon, will almost certainly leave our home shores less secure and protected,simply because manpower and resources will be depleted here at home. North Korea, Iran, hell even Cuba , can just sit back and wait until we are less able to properly defend the U.S.A.
I don't think we should spend one more minute in Iraq. We should bring our troops home NOW. As long as you are at war with an enemy who is willing to sacrifice they"re own lives on the premis of a "Holy"war,or a civil war,wich is now Iraq,you can not win.We need to concentrate on fully and agressively securing and defending our borders.All it takes is one rogue nation to push the button.And then what? Nuclear winter.Mass casualty"s,immediatly and for generations to come.We need to be able to defend from,and respond to ANY agression,ANY time.We cant do that with our resources stretched to thin.We need to remember the Viet Nam war.The time for change is now.Before it"s too late.:s4: :apachecopter:
twist n shout Reviewed by twist n shout on . Bushs' great Iraq Plan Divide and Rule: Bush's Doomed Plan for Baghdad By Robert Fisk, The Independent. Posted April 12, 2007. Revealed: a new counter-insurgency strategy to carve up the city into sealed areas. The tactic failed in Vietnam. So what chance does it have in Iraq? Faced with an ever-more ruthless insurgency in Baghdad -- despite President George Bush's "surge" in troops -- US forces in the city are now planning a massive and highly controversial counter-insurgency operation that will seal off vast Rating: 5