i really don't understand how everyon thinks 300 wasn't a good movie... it had like the perfect mix of courage/inspiration, violence and funniness...

not to mention movies based on fact are always like 10x more attractive to me....

as for shooter i haven't gotten around to watching it yet... usually the first few copies of it on the net are complete shit... so i'm giving it awhile... but i have been wanting to see it... but to me, just seems like another bourne identity...

don't get me wrong, i like those kinda movies and all, but after awhile, you only wanna watch them, so you can say you've seen it in the future and/or there was nothing better to really watch... once you've seen one, you've basicly seen them all....
slipknotpsycho Reviewed by slipknotpsycho on . SHOOTER>75(A.K.A. "300") Haha so ya first I saw 300 blazed and I thought it was a decent movie with poor dialogue and what was up with the good guys? I mean I don't know about you guys but I certaintly didn't count 300 ppl.!! But ya then tonight I saw shooter and wow, what a fucking awesome action/thriller! If you like enemy at the gates or any type of action shooter will definatly fill up you're action side:thumbsup: So what do you guys think about either of the movies and which if any did you like better?:stoned: Rating: 5