Cannacrackers kisps.net firecrackers review

[tokin'smoker]

hey everyone,
i was wondering who's checked out this website Cannacrackers - step by step recipe by kisps ?
i've heard a few good things about it, but it sounds almost too good to be true. it says that .6 grams on all four crackers. and that will get you fucked up? how many should you eat, cause that does not sound like nearly enough.
anyway, i was just wondering who's done this recipe and any suggestions/advice they could comment on. thanks.

tokin'smoker Reviewed by tokin'smoker on 04-04-2007. Cannacrackers kisps.net firecrackers review hey everyone, i was wondering who's checked out this website Cannacrackers - step by step recipe by kisps ? i've heard a few good things about it, but it sounds almost too good to be true. it says that .6 grams on all four crackers. and that will get you fucked up? how many should you eat, cause that does not sound like nearly enough. anyway, i was just wondering who's done this recipe and any suggestions/advice they could comment on. thanks. Rating: 5

[Snorbel]

Eating depends on three factors

1) tolerance
2) quality of bud
3) preparation

That is why you see such variation in dosage advice.

With a crappy preparation, suddenly you need three times as much. Or with a high tolerance or low-quality shake.

Regardless, dosage usually varies from .1 gram to 1 gram.

[evertking]

no tin foil on that one??

[kisps]

::trooper:: post not ready.

[kisps]

Attachment 274732Attachment 274732Attachment 274732

::trooper:: post not ready.

hey everyone,
i was wondering who's checked out this website Cannacrackers - step by step recipe by kisps ?
i've heard a few good things about it, but it sounds almost too good to be true. it says that .6 grams on all four crackers. and that will get you fucked up? how many should you eat, cause that does not sound like nearly enough.
anyway, i was just wondering who's done this recipe and any suggestions/advice they could comment on. thanks.

ostreadrulez:Thanks for bringing this up bud :baggy: :greenthumb: . I designed the CannaCracker recipe in 2005(:yeahright
while battling a bad lung infection which required Prednisone in order to heal. The lung infection wasn't smoke related, so I tried taking a few tokes thinking it would be fine. Turns out that Prednisone + Cannabis = Prednistoned (a combination of roid rage and cannabination which feels something like an accidental overdose on Ritalin). Also, even with a vaporizer, its not healthy to smoke while taking Prednisone, period. Its a lung irritant in vapor form, it just doesn't carry the harshness of smoke and tar, so any sick tokers out there, try this recipe or get some other edible Cannabis product.

While sitting outside in my yard, I began to get frustrated. I didn't have my Medical Recommendation back then,my frustration started, and thats when the magic of this very effective recipe started. Many, many people visit crackers.kisps.net on a daily basis (up in the tens of thousands on some days). Some naysayers out on the web who have given this recipe bad reviews either are resistant to THC, have too much time on their hands, and realistically speaking can't grasp the science behind the recipe because they're probably 13 or under and can only obtain ditch weed or spice..

Some say that this recipe is weak, its definitely not Medible grade strength(it can be if you make it exactly the way I wrote it and with Cannabis, not a brown pinecone bud, which is good for making CannaButter, not CannaCrackers. Here's something to think about for anyone thinking about the potency of these cannacrackers. Ironically the people who have negative things to say about my recipe have good things to say about micowave CannaCrackers...... nuff' said. Nuking fragile cannabinoids in a device which uses radiation for its heat source is a huge lapse in logic and common sense. I'd go on about the toxic mutation/reaction possible via Microwaving cannabinoids, the journals which pertain to that topic are very expensive, I need permission to publish them from ScienceDirect but its not worth it, the outcomes neither confirmed or denied the toxicity of cannabinoids prepared this way.

Marinol (trans-Δ9-THC tablets) is always talked about as if it is exactly Δ9-THC. What you have on the plant itself it d,l-Δ9-THC (or trans- cis-), they are isomeric configurations of a molecule Well if you have any experience with Marinol or are reading this post, you can see in plain sight that the pills are compact enough to be able to demonstrate that .8g of Kind would be most likely STRONGER than Marinol when baked into crackers. There is the the fact that additional cannabinoids are present within the plant matter, CBD is great, Δ9-THC can cause tachycardia/abnormal heartbeat in some people; THC is the stimulant of the cannabinoids, anyone who's ever smoked a bowl of some good Jack Herer knows what i'm taking about. When choosing Marinol over CannaCrackers, you are basically unconsciously playing on the side of the DEA :vader1: and the effort to ban Cannabis for Medical or Recreational use:, essentially legally financing drug wars in Mexico, while at the same time prolonging decriminalization by a significant amount. Marinol was created to prevent the legalization of Cannabis while still caring for the sick (its also a lot of money funneled into the US Healthcare via an extremely high copay for most insurance plans.

CannaCrackers pack more punch than a 10mg Marinol (in terms of the high and receptor activation differences, it would be very different than Marinol, depending on the strain). It's boIronically, Marinol Only a Sched. III substance which the World Health Org. Expert Committee on Drug Dependence will be considering talking about down-scheduling to IV). Marinol comes in 2.5, 5, and 10mg gels with Δ9-THC in a gelatin(not vegan friendly, further DEA:vader1: fail)... As you can see below, if compared to a frosty bud, you could probably reap 8-9 doses of pharmaceutical cannabinoids to put into Sesame oil and still get yer CBD and CBN at the same time!
Marinol 10mg
[attachment=o274733]

Cesamet Box
[attachment=o274731]
:twocents: - Speculation Corner:rambohead:
Taking this somewhat paranoid outlook a little deeper, there are a few other legal synthetic Cannabinoids which are prescription Medications. Cesamet, or Dronabinol, is a Schedule II Medication which contains a cannabinoid which is prescribed for nausea, it is more closely related to CBD/CBN than Marinol, however its completely synthetic. Now, if an Entrepreneurial chemist who worked for a large pharmaceutical company were working for a pharmaceutical company as a Chemist, what would hold me back from synthesizing additional cannabinoids, the funds are available for your "research" on the drug (the costs of which could only be afforded by pharmaceutical/biochemistry companies and chemists with access to an array of precursors off limits to the public. I feel that the same thing is happening with Ecstasy pills, although I haven't rolled in a good while, I always check PillReports.com & EcstasyData.org for the latest in reports on impurities.