Quote Originally Posted by Pass That Shit
And as far as logic. To me a logical person would know that there is NO possible way the Earth and everything in it would be so perfect without an architect.

NO possible way? With big capital letters and all? To me it seems illogical to just assume there's NO POSSIBLE WAY, without actually researching the complex natural mechanisms that actually do explain how the earth could be created. Think of it this way, all natural systems that don't exist in balance are bound to destroy themselves, while all natural systems that are in balance are bound to thrive and remain in tact. It is only logical that balanced systems of matter would eventually form into stable forms while the inbalanced whipe themselves out.

There is plenty of explanation for how solar systems, galaxies, planets, and yes life could come about through gradual and complex mechanisms. What is massively illogical is to declare that an intelligent architect is the only possible sollution simply because your limited mind can't understand anything else. After all, if a being as incredibly complex as god could naturally exist in and of itself, why is the same benefit of the doubt not allotted to the less complex systems that are planets and life? Or shall we just continue to ignore these problems since they don't fit our presuppositions?
mrdevious Reviewed by mrdevious on . atheism vs. agnostic I always wondered how people could be atheist. How can you be totally sure there are no gods if there is no proof? I dont necessarilly believe in god, but I believe in the chance that there could be a god, I just have no proof. So I guess I define myself as agnostic. Sorry if this is a repeated thread. Just thinking. Rating: 5