Quote Originally Posted by VisionaryUrbanTactic
you got that counter argument worked out yet?

i see, you still dont have the government reports that i asked for?

no evidence to speak of eh?

is that why you ignore my thread, and try to act like you know whats going on in other threads?


no one should listen to old zim here,his research is lacking, and he seems to back crazy conspriacy theory's that have NO HARD EVIDENCE WHAT SO EVER.
I don't understand why you come in this thread and attack me for another, but whatever. I do have an engineering degree but its not in anything that involves building structures. No one will know exactly 100% unless they were inside at the time taking notes and surviving the fall. You seem too believe the governments report should be error free... And I would be very careful to make such a claim as "no hard evidence" when conspiracy stories themselves contain very little if at all physical evidence and a whole lot of opinion.

However I will go after the motive.. Like why even bring them down at all? Seems like an unnecessary risk should it not have gone to plan. I believe a 767 sitting inside the buildings without any demo would serve the same purpose.. Why not down building 7 at our closer too the towers falling down? Why leave it there to fall in a controlled demo with all the added witnesses and camera's several hours after 1 and 2 fell? If the government could hijack 4 airplanes.. why not 5.. or 6...?

Now since someone brings doubts to my claims, look at these pictures below to what I said above. First is Ahmadinejad, then King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, and last Pervez. All muslim leaders wearing what looks like gold.